Since 1997, you’ve been coming to to discuss everything from Stephen King to writing to Harry Potter. You’ve made our site more than a place to discover your next book: you’ve made it a community. But like all things internet, is growing and changing. We've said goodbye to our community message boards—but that doesn’t mean we won’t still be a place for adventurous readers to connect and discover.

Now, you can explore the most exciting new titles (and remember the classics) at the Barnes & Noble Book Blog. Check out conversations with authors like Jeff VanderMeer and Gary Shteyngart at the B&N Review, and browse write-ups of the best in literary fiction. Come to our Facebook page to weigh in on what it means to be a book nerd. Browse digital deals on the NOOK blog, tweet about books with us,or self-publish your latest novella with NOOK Press. And for those of you looking for support for your NOOK, the NOOK Support Forums will still be here.

We will continue to provide you with books that make you turn pages well past midnight, discover new worlds, and reunite with old friends. And we hope that you’ll continue to tell us how you’re doing, what you’re reading, and what books mean to you.

Posts: 14
Registered: ‎06-11-2008
0 Kudos

Re: And don't forget John Steinbeck!!!

I totally enjoyed "Death in the afternoon". It was a rather brutal story about bullfighters. Also, liked East of Edan" the book and James Dean Movie.
I think the man was abit of a genius!
Andrew B.
Frequent Contributor
Posts: 27
Registered: ‎05-26-2008
0 Kudos

Re: And don't forget John Steinbeck!!!

I LOVE Steinbeck's work. Esp "Grapes of Wrath" & "East of Eden". I was looking for a classic to read this month so I picked up "Of Mice & Men". I couldn't help but think that it would have been better as a movie. So that you could see the emotional undertones b/t the 2 men portrayed by actors. I'm pretty sure a movie was made fairly recently by an actor that I respect but can't think of his name. (He played in Forrest Gump & lost his legs.) I think that might be an interesting movie
I was fairly disappointed in "Of Mice & Men". It was terribly tragic & sad even tho I had reason to believe all would not end well. I doubt I'll ever forget it based on the ending. It reminds me why I don't read classics that often as you can never be sureof the ending.
Which also brings up the topic of what makes a classic a classic? Who decides? Perhaps this work was just well liked in it's day which certainly doesn't bring it up to "classic" status. Do you ever think that sometimes if a book is well liked enough & the theme doesn't center around a love story that it will--given enough time--become a classic?
Users Online
Currently online: 3 members 197 guests
Recent signins:
Please welcome our newest community members: