- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Mark Thread as New
- Mark Thread as Read
- Float this Thread to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Canterbury Tales or Shakespeare?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
01-24-2012 10:32 PM
Re: Canterbury Tales or Shakespeare?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
01-25-2012 01:02 PM
All of Shakespeare's female roles were performed by men until the Restoration (approx. 1670) - so about 75-100 years give or take. He was essentially writing great roles for boys/young men. They are now considered great women's roles (Lady Macbeth, Ophelia, Juliet, Viola, etc.) because few productions are mounted in the original style.
Shakespeare is eminently more quotable - written in Chancery Standard/Early Modern English it needs no translation - but Chaucer often has better puns, especially when read alound in the Middle English so you can hear the cadence.
If you haven't read it, Boccacio's Decameron is condsidered a direct influence on Chaucer's Canterbury Tales and contains a wide range of humor and pathos.
I read and knit and dance. Compulsively feel yarn. Consume books. Darn tights. Drink too much caffiene. All that good stuff.
balletbookworm.blogspot.com
Re: Canterbury Tales or Shakespeare?
[ Edited ]- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
01-27-2012 04:25 PM - last edited on 01-27-2012 04:26 PM
I personally enjoy reading Shakespeare more than I enjoy reading Chaucer, as IMO Shakespeare is a better storyteller. It's not much of a literary analysis, but I'd rather curl up on the couch with Twelfth Night than Canterbury Tales.
Re: Canterbury Tales or Shakespeare?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
February
If Chaucer were alive today I believe he would be a famous stand up comedian &/or a sit-com star. He wrote comically about the falsehoods of people and the norms of society.
Shakespeare,on the other hand, was a brilliant businessman who wrote flowery poetry for the rich and raunchy one liners for the poor. This type of writing to all classes kept the masses attending his plays. Today we can compare him to Steven Spielberg or Aaron Sorkin. Stories are serious with a touch of humor and romance.
I guess it depends on my mood. If I wanted light irony I would choose Chaucer or if I was looking for the big picture and deeper story I would choose Shakespeare.