Since 1997, you’ve been coming to BarnesandNoble.com to discuss everything from Stephen King to writing to Harry Potter. You’ve made our site more than a place to discover your next book: you’ve made it a community. But like all things internet, BN.com is growing and changing. We've said goodbye to our community message boards—but that doesn’t mean we won’t still be a place for adventurous readers to connect and discover.

Now, you can explore the most exciting new titles (and remember the classics) at the Barnes & Noble Book Blog. Check out conversations with authors like Jeff VanderMeer and Gary Shteyngart at the B&N Review, and browse write-ups of the best in literary fiction. Come to our Facebook page to weigh in on what it means to be a book nerd. Browse digital deals on the NOOK blog, tweet about books with us,or self-publish your latest novella with NOOK Press. And for those of you looking for support for your NOOK, the NOOK Support Forums will still be here.

We will continue to provide you with books that make you turn pages well past midnight, discover new worlds, and reunite with old friends. And we hope that you’ll continue to tell us how you’re doing, what you’re reading, and what books mean to you.

Reply
Distinguished Bibliophile
Mercury_Glitch
Posts: 1,425
Registered: ‎06-07-2011
0 Kudos

SFWA displeased with Random House's ebook only imprints

http://io9.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-sfwas-clash-with-ran-452623570

 

Random House has introduced several new imprints, with the goal of only working with ebooks.  However the SFWA has some issues with the way in which these imprints, specifically the ones dealing with mystery and sci-fi, are setting up to deal with authors.  Rather than the typical payment up front, these imprints are going after a profit sharing system where neither party sees profit unless the book sells.  However the author is asked to front at least some of the costs for various things that the publisher usally pays for. 

The Wheel weaves as the Wheel wills, and we are only the thread of the Pattern.
Melissa_W
Posts: 4,124
Topics: 516
Kudos: 966
Blog Posts: 3
Ideas: 15
Solutions: 33
Registered: ‎10-19-2006
0 Kudos

Re: SFWA displeased with Random House's ebook only imprints

RHI already has a post up about changes to the contracts in response to comments, etc.  Discussion is still ongoing (obviously)

http://www.atrandom.com/eoriginals/index.php

Melissa W.
I read and knit and dance. Compulsively feel yarn. Consume books. Darn tights. Drink too much caffiene. All that good stuff.
balletbookworm.blogspot.com
Distinguished Bibliophile
patgolfneb
Posts: 1,762
Registered: ‎09-10-2011

Re: SFWA displeased with Random House's ebook only imprints

This is very much like recording contrats unknown musical acts receive. Quite often a subsidiary is given a promotion contract with grossly inflated fees. Established acts never sign such deals. The goal of such deals is to shift cost and risk to new authors which big hits now subsidize, making best sellers even more profitable. Of course this is true of most firms, hit products subsidize investment in new products. I would think publishers would be better served by controlling those costs. This just makes self publishing more attractive.
Bibliophile
5ivedom
Posts: 3,544
Registered: ‎12-03-2011
0 Kudos

Re: SFWA displeased with Random House's ebook only imprints

Very well said PatGolfNeb.

 

Wonder how long before the Simon Cowell+American Idol type of circus develops in books.

 

At any point of transition there's lots of opportunity for people to improve their position. Unfortunately it seems that either Publishers or Retailers are going to be the ones to benefit from the current apocalypse in books.

Distinguished Bibliophile
keriflur
Posts: 6,718
Registered: ‎01-05-2010
0 Kudos

Re: SFWA displeased with Random House's ebook only imprints


5ivedom wrote:

Very well said PatGolfNeb.

 

Wonder how long before the Simon Cowell+American Idol type of circus develops in books.

 

At any point of transition there's lots of opportunity for people to improve their position. Unfortunately it seems that either Publishers or Retailers are going to be the ones to benefit from the current apocalypse in books.


LOL, that already DOES exist in books, it's just not on tv because watching a panel of people read stuff is exceedingly boring.  But there are absolutely contests where the prize is a publishing contract, and some of the feedback is, well, scathing is an understatement.

 

Amazon runs one.  There are others too, though.

Bibliophile
5ivedom
Posts: 3,544
Registered: ‎12-03-2011

Re: SFWA displeased with Random House's ebook only imprints

It needs to go on TV. So Video can kill the writing star.

 

Imagine generations of impressionable kids choosing what book to read based on hwo cuteprettycool the author is or whether the author worre a fancy skirt and di d a jig.