- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Mark Thread as New
- Mark Thread as Read
- Float this Thread to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearing: It Can Bust Someone's Skull
[ Edited ]- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-14-2009 03:30 PM - edited 07-14-2009 03:31 PM
HATCH: As a result of this very permissive legal standard — and it is permissive — doesn't your decision in Maloney mean that virtually any state or local weapons ban would be permissible?
SOTOMAYOR: Sir, in Maloney, we were talking about nunchuk sticks.
HATCH: I understand.
SOTOMAYOR: Those are martial arts sticks.
HATCH: Two sticks bound together by rawhide or some sort of a—
SOTOMAYOR: Exactly. And — and when the sticks are swung, which is what you do with them, if there's anybody near you, you're going to be seriously injured, because that swinging mechanism can break arms, it can bust someone's skull.
HATCH: Sure.
I don't know about you, but I don't think this is a deep concern or even a concern at all for millions of Americans. In fact, of the two Americans I can think of who'd be most distressed, both are fictional; both live in the sewers; one is an athropomorphic talking rat, and the other is a teenaged mutant ninja turtle named after the guy who carved the David.
Has anyone else been watching/listening? Thoughts?
Re: Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearing: It Can Bust Someone's Skull
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-14-2009 04:29 PM
Grand Dame of the Land of Oz, Duchess of Fantasia, in the Kingdom of Wordsmithonia; also, Poet Laureate of the Kingdom of Wordsmithonia
Re: Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearing: It Can Bust Someone's Skull
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-14-2009 05:11 PM
His concern in that case is that her reasoning for supporting the ban on nunchucks is evidence of an over-permissiveness toward bans and toward the restriction of, presumably, Second Amendment rights. Basically, that she's liberal in her interpretation of the validity of banning weapons.
The whole thing is just theater at this point. She's getting confirmed, so it behooves conservative lawmakers to bait her into replies that make for helpful soundbites in 2010 and 2012. E.g., "President Obama and the liberal congress want to take away your right to defend yourself. (cue Sotomayor clip out of context defending restrictions on nunchucks)." You get the idea. Really, since they can't block the confirmation, the ideal tactic is to slow it down to try to milk her responses for the shrillest or most potentially frightful responses. They know, as do liberal and centrist lawmakers, that one a justice is confirmed, 90% of America will never hear about them again.
It's just interesting that what happened today was about nunchucks.
Cowabunga.
Re: Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearing: It Can Bust Someone's Skull
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-14-2009 05:15 PM
As Monty has already explained Hatch's whole reasoning behind the questioning was trying to figure out if she is going to rule on 2nd amendment issues in such a way that limits gun owners. I'm not sure how those on his side really get from a martial arts weapon to hand guns, but there you go.
By the way I think she is doing fine. She is holding her own, showing deference, and staying calm. Something totally unexpected would have to happen for her not to get confirmed. Most of what the Rep. are doing is show for their base.
dulcinea3 wrote:
So let me get this straight - allowing something to be banned is a sign of being overly permissive?
http://wordsmithonia.blogspot.com
Re: Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearing: It Can Bust Someone's Skull
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-14-2009 05:16 PM
L_Monty wrote:His concern in that case is that her reasoning for supporting the ban on nunchucks is evidence of an over-permissiveness toward bans and toward the restriction of, presumably, Second Amendment rights. Basically, that she's liberal in her interpretation of the validity of banning weapons.
The whole thing is just theater at this point. She's getting confirmed, so it behooves conservative lawmakers to bait her into replies that make for helpful soundbites in 2010 and 2012. E.g., "President Obama and the liberal congress want to take away your right to defend yourself. (cue Sotomayor clip out of context defending restrictions on nunchucks)." You get the idea. Really, since they can't block the confirmation, the ideal tactic is to slow it down to try to milk her responses for the shrillest or most potentially frightful responses. They know, as do liberal and centrist lawmakers, that one a justice is confirmed, 90% of America will never hear about them again.
It's just interesting that what happened today was about nunchucks.
Cowabunga.
Well considering the nunchuck was originally used for threshing grain, then converted to a peasents wepon. Are they going to ban farm implements wide spread?
Re: Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearing: It Can Bust Someone's Skull
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-14-2009 05:19 PM
http://wordsmithonia.blogspot.com
Re: Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearing: It Can Bust Someone's Skull
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-14-2009 09:07 PM
Ryan, C-Span has been televising it live. Check it out here:
http://www.c-span.org/Supreme-Court-Sotomayor-Sena
Ryan_G wrote:
The only problem I'm having is with the coverage. I would like to watch more than what the cable stations are showing. Most of them only show questions done by Rep. or high profile Dems. I would like to see more of the questioning and less of the pundits.
Re: Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearing: It Can Bust Someone's Skull
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-14-2009 10:50 PM
Psychee wrote:Ryan, C-Span has been televising it live. Check it out here:
http://www.c-span.org/Supreme-Court-Sotomayor-Sena
te-Confirmation-Hearings.aspx
Ryan_G wrote:
The only problem I'm having is with the coverage. I would like to watch more than what the cable stations are showing. Most of them only show questions done by Rep. or high profile Dems. I would like to see more of the questioning and less of the pundits.
http://wordsmithonia.blogspot.com
Re: Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearing: It Can Bust Someone's Skull
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-14-2009 11:19 PM
"bookmagic418.blogspot.com
Re: Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearing: It Can Bust Someone's Skull
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-15-2009 08:27 AM
Re: Sotomayor's Confirmation Hearing: It Can Bust Someone's Skull
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-15-2009 03:02 PM