Since 1997, you’ve been coming to to discuss everything from Stephen King to writing to Harry Potter. You’ve made our site more than a place to discover your next book: you’ve made it a community. But like all things internet, is growing and changing. We've said goodbye to our community message boards—but that doesn’t mean we won’t still be a place for adventurous readers to connect and discover.

Now, you can explore the most exciting new titles (and remember the classics) at the Barnes & Noble Book Blog. Check out conversations with authors like Jeff VanderMeer and Gary Shteyngart at the B&N Review, and browse write-ups of the best in literary fiction. Come to our Facebook page to weigh in on what it means to be a book nerd. Browse digital deals on the NOOK blog, tweet about books with us,or self-publish your latest novella with NOOK Press. And for those of you looking for support for your NOOK, the NOOK Support Forums will still be here.

We will continue to provide you with books that make you turn pages well past midnight, discover new worlds, and reunite with old friends. And we hope that you’ll continue to tell us how you’re doing, what you’re reading, and what books mean to you.

Frequent Contributor
Posts: 1,477
Registered: ‎10-25-2006
0 Kudos

The Fed Reserve, credit allotment and the mysterious Maiden Lane

I talk about the Fed Reserve on the classics board, so, here is a thread for commentary on the current events board:


Briefly, Maiden Lane is that controversial mysterious holding company(what holding company isn't? :smileylol: lol!)  that was created after the crash in order to allocate the "stimulus" money to designated recipients. Ordinarily the Fed Reserve cannot allocate where the money is going, but, in light of the crash, money directed in order to prevent a total economic meltdown. Exactly how this was done, or even why, or if it was effective, is still up for debate.


In general, the we consider allocation of funds at the federal level to be "too much control in the hands of the few"-that is, we generally want a "free" economy. So the Fed Reserve raises and lowers interest rates, and then lets the cards fall where they may, so to speak. Well, that's also debatable. You could say that if there had been more direction of funds in the 1990's, when the fed drastically lowered interst rates, the economy may not have fallen later, and that includes the world trade center, by the way. 



What do you think?