Reply
Wordsmith
BrandieC
Posts: 560
Registered: ‎05-19-2010

Hubbard's Invaders Plan and Mission Earth Series: Opinions?

Today's NOOK Daily Find is The Invaders Plan, by L. Ron Hubbard, the first book in his Mission Earth series.  Does anyone have an opinion regarding either this book or the series in general?  There seem to be very mixed reviews, and although the book is only $1.99 today, I don't want to buy it without a better feeling as to whether it's worth my time and money.

 

The product page contains a blurb which purports to be part of a review by Paul Goat Allen, but I can't find the full review anywhere, even though it supposedly was published in B&N's own Barnes and Noble Review.

Bibliophile
MacMcK1957
Posts: 1,409
Registered: ‎07-25-2011

Re: Hubbard's Invaders Plan and Mission Earth Series: Opinions?

$1.99 isn't the issue.  The issue is the time.  The later Hubbard books are (IMO) way too long and really just not that good.  You get to the end and can't help but think you could have found a lot better ways to spend your time.  They're not horrible.  Just not that good.

Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 7,313
Registered: ‎08-16-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Hubbard's Invaders Plan and Mission Earth Series: Opinions?


BrandieC wrote:

Today's NOOK Daily Find is The Invaders Plan, by L. Ron Hubbard, the first book in his Mission Earth series.  Does anyone have an opinion regarding either this book or the series in general?  There seem to be very mixed reviews, and although the book is only $1.99 today, I don't want to buy it without a better feeling as to whether it's worth my time and money.

 

The product page contains a blurb which purports to be part of a review by Paul Goat Allen, but I can't find the full review anywhere, even though it supposedly was published in B&N's own Barnes and Noble Review.


Here it is, Brandie – from a looooong time ago!

 

 

 

The story of Mission Earth is actually the prison confession of Soltan Gris, a former mid-level manager of the mysterious Coordinated Information Apparatus (CIA) on the planet Voltar. When chosen by his menacing boss, Lombar Hisst, to head a secret – and potentially lucrative – mission to Blito-P3 (Earth), Soltan soon realizes his opportunity of a lifetime could spell his imminent demise. Although the mission is supposed to infiltrate advanced technology into the Earthlings’ culture to preserve the planet for future use, Soltan’s real charge is to make sure it fails. His egomaniacal boss has grand – and nefarious – plans for Earth…

 

But when Jettero Heller, a handsome military hero practically oozing charisma, is conscripted into the top-secret operation, Soltan’s already loose grip on the mission unravels completely – with hilarious results!

 

A timeless satire packed with biting political and social commentary that has been called Hubbard’s magnum opus, there is a reason why the Mission Earth decalogy has sold more than 7.5 million copies in 14 languages worldwide. Witty, insightful and utterly readable, this grand saga is just as timely today as it was when it was initially released in 1985. Hubbard’s classic Battlefield Earth is like a short story compared to this ambitious – and historic – ten volume, 1.2-million word chronicle. – Paul Goat Allen

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Bibliophile
MacMcK1957
Posts: 1,409
Registered: ‎07-25-2011
0 Kudos

Re: Hubbard's Invaders Plan and Mission Earth Series: Opinions?

It seems Paul and I will have to agree to disagree on this one.  :smileyhappy:

Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 7,313
Registered: ‎08-16-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Hubbard's Invaders Plan and Mission Earth Series: Opinions?


MacMcK1957 wrote:

It seems Paul and I will have to agree to disagree on this one.  :smileyhappy:


I'm not totally disagreeing with you here – but I think as a professional reviewer, I perceive books a bit differently. I read this series and Battlefield Earth because of their "historic" (ie: commercial) significance but, that aside, I do agree – it's a huge commitment and frankly there are more entertaining releases out there. I m glad that I did read it, however.

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Distinguished Bibliophile
RHWright
Posts: 1,551
Registered: ‎10-21-2009
0 Kudos

Re: Hubbard's Invaders Plan and Mission Earth Series: Opinions?


paulgoatallen wrote:

MacMcK1957 wrote:

It seems Paul and I will have to agree to disagree on this one.  :smileyhappy:


I'm not totally disagreeing with you here – but I think as a professional reviewer, I perceive books a bit differently. I read this series and Battlefield Earth because of their "historic" (ie: commercial) significance but, that aside, I do agree – it's a huge commitment and frankly there are more entertaining releases out there. I m glad that I did read it, however.


As to any of the Hubbard books being a "commercial" success:

 

There were unsubstantiated rumors going around the bookselling community in the early 90s that the CoS (i.e. Bridge Publications) was manipulating their sales figures.

 

The gist of these, again, unsubstantiated rumors being that CoS members were instructed to buy the books, turn them into the church, and  they were then re-sold to retailers. The figuring being, stores bought more of books they sold (re-orders) that Bridge could fulfill with a much smaller print run as they were just recirculating copies.

 

I will emphasize that these were rumors. (I don't want the aggressive CoS lawyers to come after me.) But there was always something a bit odd about the customers who bought those books. They were not the usual SF/Fantasy readers. And with an eclectic experience of some decades with SF/Fantasy readers, I've met very few who've read Hubbards later work.

 

Some have read Battlefield Earth; almost all have regretted it.

 

Just my experience. I know there's a whole world of fans out there. But you'd think in over 30 years, I might have met one Hubbard fan.

Bibliophile
MacMcK1957
Posts: 1,409
Registered: ‎07-25-2011
0 Kudos

Re: Hubbard's Invaders Plan and Mission Earth Series: Opinions?


RHWright wrote:
 ...

Some have read Battlefield Earth; almost all have regretted it.

    ...


Not as much as those who saw the movie.  :smileywink:

 

I have to agree that I know very few SF fans who are fans of these books.  Most people I know have read maybe one of them, more out of curiosity than anything else.  I don't know anyone who's read several.

Distinguished Scribe
Omnigeek
Posts: 735
Registered: ‎01-25-2011
0 Kudos

Re: Hubbard's Invaders Plan and Mission Earth Series: Opinions?


paulgoatallen wrote:
Hubbard’s classicBattlefield Earth is like a short story compared to this ambitious – and historic – ten volume, 1.2-million word chronicle. – Paul Goat Allen

I found Battlefield Earth to be formulaic, trite and wordy.  It was a pathetic waste of time -- with all the worst elements of campy space opera and none of the best -- so your description would lead me to run as fast as I could away from a decalogy by the same author.  It's a shame, I liked some of his earlier stories but Battlefield Earth was just so horrible I can't see opening another one of his tomes.
Frequent Contributor
infael
Posts: 63
Registered: ‎07-03-2009
0 Kudos

Re: Hubbard's Invaders Plan and Mission Earth Series: Opinions?

I was dumb enough to read several of the ME books. The concept was good but the writing, bleh. I wish I could take back the time and $ I wasted in reading the ME books. Never felt this way about any other books, that I can recall.

 

I've never picked up another Hubbard book since.

Bibliophile
MacMcK1957
Posts: 1,409
Registered: ‎07-25-2011
0 Kudos

Re: Hubbard's Invaders Plan and Mission Earth Series: Opinions?

I have wondered about the length of those books.  Back in the day when LRH was actually popular (pre-Dianetics), he wasn't that long-winded, and you'd think with running the church and all he would have been kind of busy.  I have to wonder whether he just wrote an outline while some other writer(s) fleshed them out, the way James Patterson is cranking them out these days.