Reply
Frequent Contributor
amm1
Posts: 702
Registered: ‎04-02-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?


Psychee wrote:
That's Snape from an alternate dimension that has been transfigured into this timeline via an upside down timeturner placed inside Moaning Myrtle's toilet, right?
:smileyhappy:




I found this so very funny because part of it could be something I would base a theory on. There's bound to be some type of time turning going and what's with Myrtle and the bathroom? Is there another dimension out there? Is time going around in circles (does that even make sense)? Did someone mess with time and does it need to be fixed? I tell you, I love wild theories. Not so sure about aliens and Fawkes, though. A bit too out there for me. :smileywink:
Frequent Contributor
MsJinx
Posts: 429
Registered: ‎01-27-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?

Well, it's my theory and I'm sticking to it. Where I come from, anything unexplained is due entirely to aliens. And my great aunt's television reception hasn't been the same since men walked on the moon - she's sure of it.

But seriously, about Fawkes and why he did not come to DD in his time of need: I also think it's because DD was prepared to die and knew it had to happen. If he had called for Fawkes, or telepathically felt that he needed Fawkes, I think the bird would have been there in a second. It's a good thing Fawkes wasn't in the middle of his molting/burning/helpless baby bird cycle.



amm1 wrote:

Psychee wrote:
That's Snape from an alternate dimension that has been transfigured into this timeline via an upside down timeturner placed inside Moaning Myrtle's toilet, right?
:smileyhappy:




I found this so very funny because part of it could be something I would base a theory on. There's bound to be some type of time turning going and what's with Myrtle and the bathroom? Is there another dimension out there? Is time going around in circles (does that even make sense)? Did someone mess with time and does it need to be fixed? I tell you, I love wild theories. Not so sure about aliens and Fawkes, though. A bit too out there for me. :smileywink:


Frequent Contributor
phrodo41
Posts: 943
Registered: ‎10-19-2006
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?



MsJinx wrote:
Well, it's my theory and I'm sticking to it. Where I come from, anything unexplained is due entirely to aliens. And my great aunt's television reception hasn't been the same since men walked on the moon - she's sure of it.

But seriously, about Fawkes and why he did not come to DD in his time of need: I also think it's because DD was prepared to die and knew it had to happen. If he had called for Fawkes, or telepathically felt that he needed Fawkes, I think the bird would have been there in a second. It's a good thing Fawkes wasn't in the middle of his molting/burning/helpless baby bird cycle.



amm1 wrote:

Psychee wrote:
That's Snape from an alternate dimension that has been transfigured into this timeline via an upside down timeturner placed inside Moaning Myrtle's toilet, right?
:smileyhappy:




I found this so very funny because part of it could be something I would base a theory on. There's bound to be some type of time turning going and what's with Myrtle and the bathroom? Is there another dimension out there? Is time going around in circles (does that even make sense)? Did someone mess with time and does it need to be fixed? I tell you, I love wild theories. Not so sure about aliens and Fawkes, though. A bit too out there for me. :smileywink:







see, I think there's a difference. Fawkes didn't show up because *Dumbledore* knew he was going to die. He didn't show up because JO knew Dumbledore was supposed to die.

I think Dumbledore really thought that Snape was going to show up and heal him just like he did over the summer. The whole thing happened so fast, and Dumbledore just had a few split seconds to realize that he'd been betrayed. There was no time to summon Fawkes (assuming anyone can just "summon" fawkes, which is doubtful).

I know this is unpopular... most people think Dumbledore somehow foresaw his own death and was prepared to sacrifice himself. I don't think this is so at all. I think he was aware of a plot to kill him, but not aware of Snape's level of involvement.
Frequent Contributor
amm1
Posts: 702
Registered: ‎04-02-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?


phrodo41 wrote:

see, I think there's a difference. Fawkes didn't show up because *Dumbledore* knew he was going to die. He didn't show up because JO knew Dumbledore was supposed to die.

I think Dumbledore really thought that Snape was going to show up and heal him just like he did over the summer. The whole thing happened so fast, and Dumbledore just had a few split seconds to realize that he'd been betrayed. There was no time to summon Fawkes (assuming anyone can just "summon" fawkes, which is doubtful).

I know this is unpopular... most people think Dumbledore somehow foresaw his own death and was prepared to sacrifice himself. I don't think this is so at all. I think he was aware of a plot to kill him, but not aware of Snape's level of involvement.



Once again I can agree with several things, such as: *He didn't show up because JO knew Dumbledore was supposed to die*. Not to beat to death the cave scene again, but JO knew Dumbledore was going to die and hence we have the torch being passed on. Same thing with Fawkes not being around for Dumbledore. It was time to move on.

I'm not sure about Dumbledore asking for Snape to heal him once again though I can't think of any other reason for Dumbledore insisting on Snape's presence. OK, I can come up with another idea but for now I'll say it is possible Dumbledore needed Snape's healing ability.

I don't believe Dumbledore and Snape had a plan and I assume Dumbledore was only aware at the last moment that Snape had betrayed him. The questions arises, then, when did Dumbledore realize something was horribly wrong? Surely not in those few seconds of Snape's arrival and the AK. So when was it? In the cave?

Anyway, I'm not sure if there's another thread for the above remarks so sorry about rambling.
Frequent Contributor
MsJinx
Posts: 429
Registered: ‎01-27-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?

Whatever happened between Dumbledore and Snape is one of those wonderful, huge events that keep us guessing. I'm one of those who think Snape helped DD after the injury from the ring horcrux (stoppered death), and think DD was resigned to having Snape kill him rather than have Draco do it (since he was dying anyway), saving Draco from being a murderer,....but now you've given me the idea that maybe DD wasn't ready to go just then, that maybe he did want Snape to give him an antidote to the potion in the cave, and had important things still to impart to Harry before he was ready to die, but Snape went ahead and offed him before he was quite ready, knowing DD wanted to delay it a bit more. A little premature incantation maybe. It still leaves me up in the air about Snape, though - did he go ahead and kill DD a bit earlier than DD wanted because of the situation, and he had no other choice but to do it for Draco, before Fenrir or one of the other goons did it, or because he had an itchy wand finger?

And I still don't know who the fourth DE was who came to the tower with the Carrow's and Fenrir!!! Was it later revealed, or did I miss it somehow? If the name of that person wasn't given, I can see a scenario where Harry meets someone in DH, who is not immediately known as a DE, who may even be in a position seemingly helpful, and Harry will recognize him as that fourth DE.



phrodo41 wrote:


MsJinx wrote:
Well, it's my theory and I'm sticking to it. Where I come from, anything unexplained is due entirely to aliens. And my great aunt's television reception hasn't been the same since men walked on the moon - she's sure of it.

But seriously, about Fawkes and why he did not come to DD in his time of need: I also think it's because DD was prepared to die and knew it had to happen. If he had called for Fawkes, or telepathically felt that he needed Fawkes, I think the bird would have been there in a second. It's a good thing Fawkes wasn't in the middle of his molting/burning/helpless baby bird cycle.



amm1 wrote:

Psychee wrote:
That's Snape from an alternate dimension that has been transfigured into this timeline via an upside down timeturner placed inside Moaning Myrtle's toilet, right?
:smileyhappy:




I found this so very funny because part of it could be something I would base a theory on. There's bound to be some type of time turning going and what's with Myrtle and the bathroom? Is there another dimension out there? Is time going around in circles (does that even make sense)? Did someone mess with time and does it need to be fixed? I tell you, I love wild theories. Not so sure about aliens and Fawkes, though. A bit too out there for me. :smileywink:







see, I think there's a difference. Fawkes didn't show up because *Dumbledore* knew he was going to die. He didn't show up because JO knew Dumbledore was supposed to die.

I think Dumbledore really thought that Snape was going to show up and heal him just like he did over the summer. The whole thing happened so fast, and Dumbledore just had a few split seconds to realize that he'd been betrayed. There was no time to summon Fawkes (assuming anyone can just "summon" fawkes, which is doubtful).

I know this is unpopular... most people think Dumbledore somehow foresaw his own death and was prepared to sacrifice himself. I don't think this is so at all. I think he was aware of a plot to kill him, but not aware of Snape's level of involvement.


Frequent Contributor
PattyBNUChick
Posts: 3,319
Registered: ‎10-19-2006
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?

I think Trelawney is correct in her readings more often than Dumbledore gives her credit for.



phrodo41 wrote:


MsJinx wrote:
I was going to theorize about aliens, because they've been left out, and it isn't fair.



phrodo41 wrote:
abuse? Sorry, I'm not seeing how any of this is abusive. We're just thinking of funny reasons for Fawkes not to show up. All in good fun.







That's what you think. I'm pretty sure Trelawney is actually from Mars.


Frequent Contributor
phrodo41
Posts: 943
Registered: ‎10-19-2006
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?



amm1 wrote:

phrodo41 wrote:

see, I think there's a difference. Fawkes didn't show up because *Dumbledore* knew he was going to die. He didn't show up because JO knew Dumbledore was supposed to die.

I think Dumbledore really thought that Snape was going to show up and heal him just like he did over the summer. The whole thing happened so fast, and Dumbledore just had a few split seconds to realize that he'd been betrayed. There was no time to summon Fawkes (assuming anyone can just "summon" fawkes, which is doubtful).

I know this is unpopular... most people think Dumbledore somehow foresaw his own death and was prepared to sacrifice himself. I don't think this is so at all. I think he was aware of a plot to kill him, but not aware of Snape's level of involvement.



Once again I can agree with several things, such as: *He didn't show up because JO knew Dumbledore was supposed to die*. Not to beat to death the cave scene again, but JO knew Dumbledore was going to die and hence we have the torch being passed on. Same thing with Fawkes not being around for Dumbledore. It was time to move on.

I'm not sure about Dumbledore asking for Snape to heal him once again though I can't think of any other reason for Dumbledore insisting on Snape's presence. OK, I can come up with another idea but for now I'll say it is possible Dumbledore needed Snape's healing ability.

I don't believe Dumbledore and Snape had a plan and I assume Dumbledore was only aware at the last moment that Snape had betrayed him. The questions arises, then, when did Dumbledore realize something was horribly wrong? Surely not in those few seconds of Snape's arrival and the AK. So when was it? In the cave?

Anyway, I'm not sure if there's another thread for the above remarks so sorry about rambling.




Amm1, I am happy to see that you agree with me because I am so often in a minority around here!

Actually, I really do think it was those last few seconds that Dumbledore realized he had been wrong about Snape. It's just great drama, like something out of shakespeare. That split second of sickening realization before you die. Like Romeo realizing that Juliet isn't dead seconds after he takes the poison. Or more aptly, Caesar and Brutus. Instead of "Severus Please," he may have well have said "E tu brute?" That's why I'm so adamant about having an evil Snape. "Severus please don't betray everyone" is just so much better drama than "Severus please kill me like I asked to you earlier this year."

I just checked HBP and see another reason that Dumbledore wanted Snape for healing (not for death) - it's because he asks for Snape just a few paragraphs BEFORE Rosmerta fills them in on the Dark Mark over Hogwarts.
Frequent Contributor
phrodo41
Posts: 943
Registered: ‎10-19-2006
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?



PattyBNUChick wrote:
I think Trelawney is correct in her readings more often than Dumbledore gives her credit for.



phrodo41 wrote:


MsJinx wrote:
I was going to theorize about aliens, because they've been left out, and it isn't fair.



phrodo41 wrote:
abuse? Sorry, I'm not seeing how any of this is abusive. We're just thinking of funny reasons for Fawkes not to show up. All in good fun.







That's what you think. I'm pretty sure Trelawney is actually from Mars.







absolutely she is!
Contributor
jayme
Posts: 11
Registered: ‎01-31-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?

Honestly though, I don't think we can ignore that JKR describes Snape as having a look of disgust on his face just before he kills DD. Why would she put that if it wasn't supposed to mean something? I'm sure a bunch of you will say it's disgust at the act he was being made to commit and I won't necessarily say it isn't, but it always struck me how deliberately she put that in. BTW, I haven't made up my mind about whether Snape is evil or not and I know it's a touchy subject, so please don't hate me, lol.
Inspired Bibliophile
Psychee
Posts: 7,307
Registered: ‎04-17-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?

Jayme, why would we hate you for being undecided about Snape? Those who believe he is completely evil, like phrodo, give perfectly logical and believeable reasons for their beliefs. Many of those (not all-- I've heard some really wild theories) who think he is a messed up guy who is secretly good ALSO give perfectly logical and believeable reasons for their beliefs, but are on iffier ground because they have to figure out a means to get him from how he appears so far to what they think he is.

The answer is : NO ONE KNOWS. And that is exactly what the author has given us -- a mystery!

Not choosing a side is probably the safest and most intelligent way to go!
Frequent Contributor
amm1
Posts: 702
Registered: ‎04-02-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?


jayme wrote:
Honestly though, I don't think we can ignore that JKR describes Snape as having a look of disgust on his face just before he kills DD. Why would she put that if it wasn't supposed to mean something?



I think you are right. We are suppose to notice the look on Snape's face, which is actually described as revulsion and hatred. I don't believe this had anything to do with Snape being asked earlier in the story to kill Dumbledore when necessary. I believe we see Snape's true feelings here. There is nothing in canon showing Snape caring for Dumbledore.

As a Snape fan who pretty much frequents Snape boards, I get my share of grief. :smileywink:
Inspired Bibliophile
Psychee
Posts: 7,307
Registered: ‎04-17-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?



jayme wrote:
Honestly though, I don't think we can ignore that JKR describes Snape as having a look of disgust on his face just before he kills DD. Why would she put that if it wasn't supposed to mean something?




I thought he looked disgusted and angry at EVERYONE for what he had to do -- angry at Voldemort, at Draco, at Narcissa, at Harry, at Dumbledore, at all the Death Eaters, and the whole lousy predicament he was in --

Good Snape or bad, he is not in the best situation right now. Draco had the order to kill Dumbledore, everyone else was told to let him do it. Snape has now done it for him, depriving Voldy of his revenge to Mr. Malfoy. Voldy will still want to punish Draco, Snape still has to protect Draco, this puts Snape at odds against Voldy.

And if Snape is good, that makes it even worse, because now Snape is completely alone without help as the entire Order believes he is on the Death Eater side.
Frequent Contributor
phrodo41
Posts: 943
Registered: ‎10-19-2006
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?

[ Edited ]
It seems plain as daylight to me. Snape hated Dumbledore, and killed him. I think he hated him more than any of us knew, which is why the force of his killing curse blasted him into the air. I think Snape has all kind of reasons to hate Dumbledore too (Despite DD being relatively good to him).

- Dumbledore has placed unreasonable demands on Snape, hence the argument in the forest. (My fun theory - Dumbledore wanted Snape to go back to making Wolfsbane potion for Lupin)
- Dumbledore will put just about anyone in the DADA job rather than give it to Snape. If you've ever been in a situation like this at work, you know how this feels. It really, really sucks. Dumbledore's trust in Lupin was especially frustrating, considering their history.
- Instead of protecting Snape, Dumbledore keeps putting Snape in the front lines as a double agent role, knowing full well the dangers involved.
- Dumbledore covered up the werewolf incident and instead of having James and Sirius expelled, made James head boy.
- Dumbledore continues this favoritism towards James by taking a special interest in Harry, who Snape doesn't think is particularly special or talented at all, and is exactly like his father.

The look of hatred and revulsion fits right in with all this, and has support from canon. I don't think he was like this all along... he may have had good intentions awhile ago, but at some point, he decided that the dangers/cons of working for Dumbledore were by far outweighing the pros, and being a Slytherin, chose to preserve his own self interests rather than help the Order.

Message Edited by phrodo41 on 05-10-200711:07 PM

Message Edited by phrodo41 on 05-10-200711:09 PM

Inspired Bibliophile
Psychee
Posts: 7,307
Registered: ‎04-17-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?

All logical reasons, Phrodo, except that by the time Snape killed Dumbledore, he should have been over your #2 reason as he had the DADA position by then... it works for earlier years, though...
Frequent Contributor
phrodo41
Posts: 943
Registered: ‎10-19-2006
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?



Psychee wrote:
All logical reasons, Phrodo, except that by the time Snape killed Dumbledore, he should have been over your #2 reason as he had the DADA position by then... it works for earlier years, though...




ah - you're right! Snape should be over the whole DADA thing. But then, you've seen how some kids can act, when you go and do something nice for them. And they turn around and blast you with an AK! Kids these days...
Inspired Bibliophile
Psychee
Posts: 7,307
Registered: ‎04-17-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?

Snape certainly fits the description of "an ungrateful wretch of a boy"... if that which we see can be accepted as reflecting the true nature of his relationship with Dumbledore.

Whether he's working for good or bad, though, as far as I'm concerned he's a rotten small-minded teacher to Harry. I don't think anyone could ever explain that part away!
Frequent Contributor
PattyBNUChick
Posts: 3,319
Registered: ‎10-19-2006

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?

I agree, you shouldn't take your personal frustrations out on your students, but the overall picture, think about it, Snape imo has got to be so frustrated. He got 2 people killed, he couldn't stand one of them and now he's got to look at his spitting image (minus the eyes) every day. If he really did have a crush on Lily (I don't know if he did or not, but I'm speculating that he did), he's got to look at her eyes every day and look at the kid that became an orphan after he got the ball rolling by telling Voldemort part of the prophecy and he's really a white hat trying to fake out the bad guys and Dumbledore's got him at Hogwarts tying to teach children, probably not something he wants to do with his life. He's a seriously frustrated man.



Psychee wrote:
Snape certainly fits the description of "an ungrateful wretch of a boy"... if that which we see can be accepted as reflecting the true nature of his relationship with Dumbledore.

Whether he's working for good or bad, though, as far as I'm concerned he's a rotten small-minded teacher to Harry. I don't think anyone could ever explain that part away!


Frequent Contributor
phrodo41
Posts: 943
Registered: ‎10-19-2006
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?

[ Edited ]
not only that, he is now stuck babysitting Draco, and personally ensuring his safety. Rememebr the first clause of the Vow? "Will you look after Draco and protect him from harm?" there's no time limit on this. Snape is stuck. And I doubt Voldemort is very tolerant of his death eaters taking Unbreakable Vows to protect each other. Draco will resent Snape trying to protect him and try to keep "detouring" from him, but Snape will have to do it anyway because of the Vow.

This could get REALLY interesting if Draco turns out to be a werewolf (I really really like this idea).

Message Edited by phrodo41 on 05-10-200711:49 PM

Inspired Bibliophile
Psychee
Posts: 7,307
Registered: ‎04-17-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?



phrodo41 wrote....
This could get REALLY interesting if Draco turns out to be a werewolf (I really really like this idea...




You get so excited over werewolves! lol.... But you don't think Draco could be a werewolf yet, do you? I mean, someone would have noticed, don't you think? Or are you imagining that the potion would keep him totally without symptoms?
Inspired Bibliophile
Psychee
Posts: 7,307
Registered: ‎04-17-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Where was Fawkes when Dumbledore died?


PattyBNUChick wrote:
I agree, you shouldn't take your personal frustrations out on your students, but the overall picture, think about it, Snape imo has got to be so frustrated. He got 2 people killed, he couldn't stand one of them and now he's got to look at his spitting image (minus the eyes) every day. If he really did have a crush on Lily (I don't know if he did or not, but I'm speculating that he did), he's got to look at her eyes every day and look at the kid that became an orphan after he got the ball rolling by telling Voldemort part of the prophecy and he's really a white hat trying to fake out the bad guys and Dumbledore's got him at Hogwarts tying to teach children, probably not something he wants to do with his life. He's a seriously frustrated man.





Doesn't excuse him one bit for taking it out on Harry. And I'll never forgive him for the remark he made to Hermione ("I don't see any difference" ) about her hexed growing teeth!

He can be tortured inside, but he's the one that goes on about "disciplining the mind" and he is good at it... but not to children.