- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Email to a Friend
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
I’m a notorious procrastinator and collector of books. I’m less of a punctual reader. The quantity of novels accrues while my time to read remains constant; one certainly overwhelms the other. But these unopened treasures are waiting for me, like wrapped gifts, promising something irresistible once they’re opened and allowed to tell their story. They whisper, "Put down that romance! Come! Read me!" And sometimes I need a break, and I think these books, these novels, will provide a dalliance from my long-term relationship with dashing heroes and spunky heroines.
Recently, all my diversionary reads have had a common theme: magic. There is something about magic that beguiles; characters with a special relationship to nature, a world that’s slightly more sensory than the one I live in, and capabilities that are at once enviable and terrible. I like magic stories. I don’t need an elaborately-constructed alternate universe to keep me entertained. Drop a touch of the strange into an everyday setting, and I’m good. Also, I’m from New England; sorcery stories appeal to me because so much of our relationship with the supernatural springs from the patch of land northwest of Boston, where women were put to death for witchcraft.
My diversions aren’t really diversions at all: the books I read are all romances, in a way. No love story? I’m out. I rarely make it through the first hundred pages if there isn’t a romantic relationship on the line. And so this brings me to Deborah Harkness' A Discovery of Witches (All Souls Trilogy #1). I knew, obviously from the title, that there was going to be a search for magic. I’m not immune to book buzz so I knew there was a vampire involved. The first pages brought into focus that there’d be an ancient manuscript and a scholar on the hunt (these are common traits with Deliverance Dane, but executed in wildly different ways so that the similarities were no more than a curiosity.) And then, boom! I’m in the middle of a paranormal romance, with a powerful witch who’s refused her powers falling head over heels for a lethal, gallant, charming, irresistible bloodsucking college professor. Matthew Clairmont will kill to protect his beloved Diana Bishop. Why in the world would I want a diversion from this stuff? It’s the best kind of reading there is.
I don't know what my examination of my attempt to pepper my reading with non-romances tells us. Are all novels love stories anyway, and I should just content myself with that? Or am I guided by an unseen force to only buy books where boy meets girl, boy loves girl, and the happy ending is the goal?
Tell me: what do you read when you take a romance break? And can you finish a book without a love story in it?
Melanie Murray is a writer and editor, and the moderator of Romantic Reads, BN.com's all-romance, all-the-time community forum. You can follow her on Twitter at @Melanie_Murray and get all the latest Barnes & Noble book news from @BNBuzz
- Mark as Read
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
I started out reading fantasy and sci-fi. I never knew I would love a romance book until I got a freebie. Now I read them more and more often. I am getting a bit spoiled by love and happy endings, but as long as a fantasy/ sci-fi story doesn't have too bleak of a plot then I can usually step away from the romances.
- Mark as Read
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
I read fantasy/sci-fi, but also thrillers and mysteries. I do prefer the story to have some romance in it, but can enjoy the book without it as well. It helps to have a "palate cleanser" book every now and then to keep things fresh. After reading too many romance novels I tend to need something to mix it up so I can go back to the romance genre fresh and "in love" with love again.
- Mark as Read
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
Great article Melanie, well I read a LOT of romances a month and the number just went up too ![]()
but then love makes the world go round and i never really need a "break" from romance, but I'm a genre-hopper anyway I love hard fantasy, adult fairy tales, si-fi, thrillers and mysteris too and once in a great while I'll find a non-fiction I can stomache ![]()
But it's true what you said above that when you take a break from romance a love story just comes up and hits you on the head
my perfect example of this is Overseas by Beatriz Williams
- Mark as Read
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
I started out reading mysteries, but eventually realized many of my favorites (Mary Stewart's books, for instance) featured a romance. Now I'm a hardcore fan of both mystery AND romance - and, like you, I especially like books with a touch of magic. When it comes to best sellers, if there's no romance, no happy ending? Not for me.
I'll still read mysteries that don't include a romantic storyline, but the ones on my keeper shelf almost always have a little of both.
- Mark as Read
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
I generally read mysteries (historical ones) when I am not reading romances. But even those often have some aspect of romance to them (I like the Deanna Raybourn and Tasha Alexander mysteries). I recently branched out into a contemporary thriller (Chris Pavone's The Expats--I really liked it). Other than that, I read science fiction or fantasy. I have Connie Willis' Blackout sitting nearby and Naomi Novik's latest Temeraire novel waiting for me. Hope to get to them soon. I keep finding books at the library that I want to read first.
Denise
You must be a registered user to add a comment here. If you've already registered, please log in. If you haven't registered yet, please register and log in.
