- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Mark Thread as New
- Mark Thread as Read
- Float this Thread to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Melville's biography
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-07-2006 05:29 PM
Re: Melville's biography : Poorly educated!
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-09-2006 03:58 AM
Melville was also a voracious reader and 'he read to write', which is very evident from Moby Dick, with its 'Cetology' and many classical references: 'Coming to literature relatively late in life, Melville did so not with the reluctance of an unwilling recipient of some institutionally imposed reading-list, but with the wide-eyed eagerness of the auto-didact, hungry for the resources of the world's great books. Scholars searching for Melville's secrets have given great attention to his reading...'(Dr David Herd, Lecturer in English & American Literature, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.) All this erudition despite 'an irregular education' makes you wonder why we bother to send our children to school!!
fanuzzir wrote:
Herman Melville had a checkered professional and personal life befitting an ambitious, and in his own mind at least, unappreciated artist. Does anyone have any insight into the writer's life that will shed light on his novel[s]?
Re: Melville's biography : Poorly educated!
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-10-2006 12:14 AM
Re: Melville's biography : Poorly educated!
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-10-2006 07:27 AM
'But the third Emir [Flask], now seeing himself all alone on the quarter-deck, seems to feel relieved from some curious constraint, for, tipping all sort of knowing winks in all sorts of directions, and kicking off his shoes, he strikes into a sharp and noiseless squall of hornpipe right over the Grand Turk's head; and then by dexterous slight...he goes down rollicking, so far at least as he remains visible from the deck, reversing all other processions, by bringing up the rear with music. But 'ere stepping into the cabin doorway below, he pauses, ships a new face altogether, and then, independent, hilarious little Flask enters King Ahab's presence, in the character of Abjectus the Slave.'
A litle bit of working class rebellion there I think and perhaps a portent of things to come?
fanuzzir wrote:
Great summation! I agree with his working class politics as well--Melville deliberately substituted the erudite classics education he got on the fly to the privileged college career his peers enjoyed.
Re: Melville's biography
[ Edited ]- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-10-2006 03:40 PM - edited 12-10-2006 03:40 PM
---------
Herman Melville was born on August 1, 1819 in New York City into an established merchant family. His father became bankrupt and insane, dying when Melville was 12. A bout of scarlet fever in 1826 left Melville with permanently weakened eyesight. He attended Albany (N.Y.) Classical School in 1835. From the age of 12, he worked as a clerk, teacher, and farmhand. In search of adventures, he shipped out in 1839 as a cabin boy on the whaler Achushnet. He later joined the US Navy, and started his years long voyages on ships, sailing both the Atlantic and the South Seas.
Typee, an account of his stay with cannibals, was first published in Britain, like most of his works. Its sequel, Omoo (1847), was based on his experiences in the Polynesian Islands, and gained as huge a success as the first one. Throughout his career Melville enjoyed a rather higher estimation in Britain than in America. His third book, Mardi And A Voyage Thither was published in 1849.
In 1847 Melville married Elisabeth Shaw, daughter of the chief justice of Massachusetts. After three yeas in New York, he bought a farm, "Arrowhead", near Nathaniel Hawthorne's home at Pittsfield, Massachusetts, and became friends with him for some time.
Inspired by the suggestions of Hawthorne, Melville wrote his masterpiece, Moby Dick. When the novel was published, it did not bring him the fame he had acquired in the 1840s. Only some critics and very few readers noted its brilliance.
Through the narrator of Moby Dick, Ishmael, the author meditated questions about faith and the workings of God's intelligence. He returned to these meditations in his last great work, Billy Budd, a story left unfinished at his death and posthumously published in 1924. Melville died of heart failure on September 28, 1891.
Please enter the whole link otherwise it leads astray:
from http://www.online-literature.com/melville/
Another biography:
http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/bb/hm_bio.html
Message
Message Edited by ziki on 12-10-200609:53 PM
tahiti
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-10-2006 04:05 PM
-------
Interesting...
Paul Gaugin arrived circum fifty years later still thinking Tahiti was an undisturbed paradise.
no success with MbD
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-10-2006 04:12 PM
----
Question: Any speculations why MbD was not recognized by the contemporary public as a great book?
ziki
Re: no success with MbD
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-10-2006 04:37 PM
ziki wrote:
quote:Inspired by the suggestions of Hawthorne, Melville wrote his masterpiece, Moby Dick. When the novel was published, it did not bring him the fame he had acquired in the 1840s. Only some critics and very few readers noted its brilliance.
----
Question: Any speculations why MbD was not recognized by the contemporary public as a great book?
ziki
Re: no success with MbD
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-10-2006 10:49 PM
ziki wrote:
quote:Inspired by the suggestions of Hawthorne, Melville wrote his masterpiece, Moby Dick. When the novel was published, it did not bring him the fame he had acquired in the 1840s. Only some critics and very few readers noted its brilliance.
----
Question: Any speculations why MbD was not recognized by the contemporary public as a great book?
ziki
But this is so often the case! There have been so many brilliant artists who did not enjoy any of the fruits of their labors; most of them basically died old, poor and completely unappreciated in their beds. I agree that time has a lot to do with it. Many of these writers were simply "ahead" of the times they were born into. It's almost as though the rest of the world had to catch up with them.
Cheryl
Re: no success with MbD
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-10-2006 11:35 PM
ziki wrote:
quote:Inspired by the suggestions of Hawthorne, Melville wrote his masterpiece, Moby Dick. When the novel was published, it did not bring him the fame he had acquired in the 1840s. Only some critics and very few readers noted its brilliance.
----
Question: Any speculations why MbD was not recognized by the contemporary public as a great book?
ziki
I thought we had until December 26th before starting so I started reading Typee on the side for background. In that introduction they talked about the failure of Moby Dick in its own time and I will quote from it:
---------------------
Moby Dick was as we know now, the masterpiece, but in his own time it was attacked and criticized for its uncouth form, its verbosity, its irrelevancies, its extravagant emotions centered around the cruise of an ordinary whaling ship--and perhaps for the other things not entirely mentionable to the increasingly staid and proper literary conscience of New England and New York.
--------------------
In short Moby Dick was, like many other masterpieces, was simply ahead of its time.
Now it is back to Moby Dick.
Bucky
Re: no success with MbD : Politics of the book
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-11-2006 12:36 AM
'...as this Introduction is being written, in late September 2001, the ideal sensibility Melville articulated through Ishmael, and which America has always failed to live up to, is at odds, once more with a fanatical force. Again Melville is diagnosing our condition. Always we need to know what Moby Dick has to teach.'
It will be instructive to see what parallels readers here find in Moby Dick which relate to the politics of the society we live in today.
leakybucket wrote:
ziki wrote:
quote:Inspired by the suggestions of Hawthorne, Melville wrote his masterpiece, Moby Dick. When the novel was published, it did not bring him the fame he had acquired in the 1840s. Only some critics and very few readers noted its brilliance.
----
Question: Any speculations why MbD was not recognized by the contemporary public as a great book?
ziki
I thought we had until December 26th before starting so I started reading Typee on the side for background. In that introduction they talked about the failure of Moby Dick in its own time and I will quote from it:
---------------------
Moby Dick was as we know now, the masterpiece, but in his own time it was attacked and criticized for its uncouth form, its verbosity, its irrelevancies, its extravagant emotions centered around the cruise of an ordinary whaling ship--and perhaps for the other things not entirely mentionable to the increasingly staid and proper literary conscience of New England and New York.
--------------------
In short Moby Dick was, like many other masterpieces, was simply ahead of its time.
Now it is back to Moby Dick.
Bucky
no hurry bucky
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-11-2006 05:17 AM
leakybucket wrote:I thought we had until December 26th before starting ....
yes we have..I was just warming upp a little, starting to read 'around the subject'. I do not even have the book itself. No hurry, bucky. The book you started with was obviously the one most popular among his contemporaries. It would be interesting to hear your comparisons later on with MbD.
ziki
melville popular in UK
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-11-2006 05:21 AM
Choisya wrote:
According to my Introduction by Dr Herd of the University of Kent, Moby Dick was first recognised as a masterpeice by the educated British working class 'who circulated it through their societies and institutions, liking what it had to say about working life'.
This chimes with the statement that Melville was more popular in UK than in US.
ziki
Re: Typee
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-11-2006 11:07 AM
ziki wrote:
leakybucket wrote:I thought we had until December 26th before starting ....
yes we have..I was just warming upp a little, starting to read 'around the subject'. I do not even have the book itself. No hurry, bucky. The book you started with was obviously the one most popular among his contemporaries. It would be interesting to hear your comparisons later on with MbD.
ziki
I became interested in Ishmael's comments and relationship with Queequeg. It seems like a most enlightened relationship for its time. I'm also intrigued with Queequeg himself. I started Typee because it was about the time when Melville lived with the natives and probably where he formed his opinions that Ishmael has towards Queequog.
Our time-table has been moved up so I figured I had better get back to Moby Dick. I will still try to fit in Typee. I think it is an important backgrounder for Queequeg.
Bucky
Re: Typee
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-11-2006 11:27 AM
http://www.online-literature.com/melville/typee/
Re: Typee
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-12-2006 10:48 PM
Re: melville popular in UK
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-12-2006 10:56 PM
What does this have to say about Moby Dick? As you may have discovered, the first few chapter are on the ground, ritualistic, documentary accounts of working class life on a ship--without Whitman's homoerotics but still filled with sympathy and first hand knowledge. You can see this as well in Billy Budd, which I think is Melville's tightest novel.
As for the question of Moby Dick's failure in the mid-nineteenth century: a travel narrative stuffed with philosophical meaning violated the rules of literary enjoyment. For philosophy, one read Emerson; for travel narratives, one was supposed to read writers like Melville had once been. So there's really the question of why and when it was acclaimed. Again, thank you Choisya: a "Melville Revivial" of the 1920s that discovered the lost text of Billy Budd turned into an American studies academic discipline that was looking for a "Cold War" text to anchor the field and say something meaningful about the ideological struggle of American liberal democracy with Communism. And Moby Dick fit the bill. Why? Let's talk more and find out.
Melville today
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-13-2006 08:41 PM
http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?sto
Re: Melville today
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-14-2006 04:48 PM
Re: Melville today
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
12-14-2006 05:08 PM
fanuzzir wrote:
Thanks for that article. This is embarassing: how do you insert a link like that?
I just went CTR C to the link in the long "Go" box at the top of my desktop when I was on that page, then went CTR V to where I wanted it in the post, and after I sent the post it was there. As you can tell, I am very technical. It must be magic, because it didn't used to do that. I use Mozilla Firefox for my grazer. Maybe that helps.