Since 1997, you’ve been coming to BarnesandNoble.com to discuss everything from Stephen King to writing to Harry Potter. You’ve made our site more than a place to discover your next book: you’ve made it a community. But like all things internet, BN.com is growing and changing. We've said goodbye to our community message boards—but that doesn’t mean we won’t still be a place for adventurous readers to connect and discover.

Now, you can explore the most exciting new titles (and remember the classics) at the Barnes & Noble Book Blog. Check out conversations with authors like Jeff VanderMeer and Gary Shteyngart at the B&N Review, and browse write-ups of the best in literary fiction. Come to our Facebook page to weigh in on what it means to be a book nerd. Browse digital deals on the NOOK blog, tweet about books with us,or self-publish your latest novella with NOOK Press. And for those of you looking for support for your NOOK, the NOOK Support Forums will still be here.

We will continue to provide you with books that make you turn pages well past midnight, discover new worlds, and reunite with old friends. And we hope that you’ll continue to tell us how you’re doing, what you’re reading, and what books mean to you.

Reply
Author
michaelgruber
Posts: 13
Registered: ‎04-18-2007
0 Kudos

Re: Early Chapters Discussion: A Dramatic Discovery?

No full ms of a produced Elizabethan or Jacobean play survives. We do have a ms copy of the un-produced 'Sir Thomas More' which supposedly have some contributions in Sh.'s own hand. No one cared much about manuscript in the early modern period--when the thing was set in type, the original was usually discarded, as I explain in the novel. Paper was useful for lots of things besides writing on and fairly expensive, as it was hand-made from rags.
Frequent Contributor
Bastet
Posts: 39
Registered: ‎12-12-2006
0 Kudos

Re: Early Chapters Discussion: A Dramatic Discovery?


michaelgruber wrote:
Well, we do know a good deal about the period Sh. lived in. Reams have been written about it, and that's one of the astounding things about Sh.--how little we know about him compared to what we know about his contemporaries, which is quite a bit. Sh. is _unusually_, even _uniquely_ obscure, given his prominence during his own lifetime.



Hi Mr. Gruber~

That is one of the most fascinating things I have always wondered about Shakespeare. It strikes me as very interesting that we know so much about this time period, the turn of the 17th century, and yet we know so little about the Bard himself. I read, a few years ago, "Will in the World," which was a biography of Shakespeare based on his plays. It was one of the first real biographies I had read of Shakespeare and I remember being struck by how little we actually know about him. I know you have commented before, as have others, that it is a quirk that his is one of the best-known names in the world, not just in literature but in general, and yet he himself is such a ghost. And that goes double considering how much historians know about the time period in which he lived!

Thanks!
Rachel
Users Online
Currently online: 51 members 655 guests
Please welcome our newest community members: