Since 1997, you’ve been coming to to discuss everything from Stephen King to writing to Harry Potter. You’ve made our site more than a place to discover your next book: you’ve made it a community. But like all things internet, is growing and changing. We've said goodbye to our community message boards—but that doesn’t mean we won’t still be a place for adventurous readers to connect and discover.

Now, you can explore the most exciting new titles (and remember the classics) at the Barnes & Noble Book Blog. Check out conversations with authors like Jeff VanderMeer and Gary Shteyngart at the B&N Review, and browse write-ups of the best in literary fiction. Come to our Facebook page to weigh in on what it means to be a book nerd. Browse digital deals on the NOOK blog, tweet about books with us,or self-publish your latest novella with NOOK Press. And for those of you looking for support for your NOOK, the NOOK Support Forums will still be here.

We will continue to provide you with books that make you turn pages well past midnight, discover new worlds, and reunite with old friends. And we hope that you’ll continue to tell us how you’re doing, what you’re reading, and what books mean to you.

Posts: 10
Registered: ‎08-27-2010
0 Kudos

Re: W/ 1.5 did we lose the "Furthest read page" feature?

OK, That's something I noticed a few days ago (just slow I guess) Somehow I ended up at the BEGINNING of the book I was reading. I just noticed that in My B&N Library listing of books it shows the following: "on page 'n' of 345" for a book with 345 pages. Still, I don't think I read about this "feature" when I went to 1.5.

Frequent Contributor
Posts: 57
Registered: ‎07-08-2010
0 Kudos

Re: W/ 1.5 did we lose the "Furthest read page" feature?

Absolutely agree with you. Extremely frustrated. I make copious notes. Also wish highlights/notes appeared as a list as bookmarks do. When, oh, when...?
Top Kudoed Authors
User Kudos Count
Users Online
Currently online: 35 members 1,148 guests
Please welcome our newest community members: