- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Mark Thread as New
- Mark Thread as Read
- Float this Thread to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-12-2012 11:42 AM
You have two Nook Simple Touch e-readers sitting on a desk. Both have Wi-Fi turned off and neither Nook will be touched or have pages turned. One Nook is “locked” on the screensaver page. The other Nook is displaying a page in a book, and the screensaver will not activate for an hour.
Question 1: After 15 minutes, have both Nooks theoretically consumed the same battery power?
Question 2: After 15 minutes, would an all white screensaver image consume the same battery power as an all black screensaver image?
Just wondering ...
Thanks,
Marty
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-12-2012 12:05 PM
Marty-TX wrote:
Question 1: After 15 minutes, have both Nooks theoretically consumed the same battery power?
Question 2: After 15 minutes, would an all white screensaver image consume the same battery power as an all black screensaver image?
Yes and yes.
There is no power consumed (by the screen) in displaying an image; only in changing the image. The black and white display you see is actually black and white ends of microcapsules suspended in solution. Depending on what electric charge is applied, either black or white will rise to surface.
Once the particles have rearranged themselves, no power is consumed by the display.
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-12-2012 12:26 PM
Ya_Ya,
Thank you.
I keep a very short "time-out" for my laptop and smart phone to dim the screen and preserve battery life. Was hoping that the same technique was not needed for my Nook ... your answer was good news.
Marty
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-12-2012 12:41 PM
Limiting the discussion to the screen is not realistic. I assume that when the screen saver goes on that the processor inside is also entering a low power mode, running just fast enough to keep ram refreshed. This is eqivalent to a sleep mode on your P.C. The only way to know for sure is to run the test with the screen saver time out set to a very long time out - say 24 hours to see if there is any perceptible difference in discharge rates.
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-12-2012 01:17 PM
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-12-2012 04:40 PM
MacFlash and bobstro,
You’ve raised some interesting points. When not asleep, a system timer must be running to determine when screensaver mode should begin. Likewise, the screen sensors must be running waiting for a touch. These “waiting” events must have an impact on battery usage that stops after the screensaver mode begins.
However, continuing with the PC analogy: when you wake up a PC from sleep mode, there is a flurry of very high CPU activity. I’m wondering if waking the Nook several times in an hour consumes more battery power than just letting it sit on a single page for an hour.
Because the Nook has a limited screensaver timer range (2-minutes to 1-hour), there won’t be any 24-hour evaluation. I’ll continue my current mode of operation (15-minute screensaver timer) and keep enjoying the Nook.
Thanks for the information.
Marty
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-12-2012 05:06 PM
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-12-2012 08:02 PM
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-12-2012 11:10 PM
Ya_Ya wrote:
Well said.
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-13-2012 07:27 PM
IMO if you're the type of reader that gets interrupted or distracted a lot when reading, you'll have better battery life w/ the longer timeout, because you'll decrease your screen changes. For me, I find that I look up from my book to answer a question my husband has, or to feed the dog, or to change over the laundry, and each time the nook goes to screensaver (on a 5 minute timer). I could probably save battery life by avoiding all of these screen changes (2 for each time it times out).
If you're the type of reader who sits and reads and doesn't jump up every few pages to do something, then it won't matter which one you pick, as either way, you can always just manually put your nook to sleep when you're done reading. It's not like you have to wait for the clock to click down for your nook to take a nap.
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-13-2012 10:32 PM
I have to agree. If you are somebody that is continually putting down and picking up their book every five minutes, I'd put the screensaver a little longer. Somewhere there is a crossover point where the amount of time in screensaver mode is an actual power savings, but who knows where it is. Similarly, somewhere there is powersavings by completely shutting it down, as opposed to putting it in screens saver mode. I suspect, however that is in the range of days.
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-13-2012 11:40 PM
You folks must live in households without cats. I set my timeout to the minumum, and I usually put it to sleep manually before I set it down, even for a moment. There's no knowing when the cat might decide to see whether the infrared system responds to paws.
Currently reading:
Drift by Rachel Maddow
At Home in the Universe by Stuart A. Kauffman
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-14-2012 09:20 AM
Sun_Cat wrote:You folks must live in households without cats. I set my timeout to the minumum, and I usually put it to sleep manually before I set it down, even for a moment. There's no knowing when the cat might decide to see whether the infrared system responds to paws.
And why, exactly, do you mind if your cat gets some reading done while you're not using your NOOK? Quit being selfish. ![]()
Seriously though, putting the unit face down sounds like a good protective measure against felines.
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-14-2012 10:13 AM
bobstro wrote:
And why, exactly, do you mind if your cat gets some reading done while you're not using your NOOK? Quit being selfish.
Seriously though, putting the unit face down sounds like a good protective measure against felines.
The cat talks, so there's no reason she shouldn't read, I suppose. I just don't want her buying everything in the store. ![]()
As for setting the NST face down, I don't always have a flat, stable surface available, so I prefer face up to avoid inadvertently engaging the IR. For example, face down on the bed would probably be a bad idea.
Currently reading:
Drift by Rachel Maddow
At Home in the Universe by Stuart A. Kauffman
Re: Screensaver versus Book Page - Any difference in Battery Usage?
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
02-14-2012 10:50 AM
Many thanks for all the replies. I'm glad that I joined the B&N Community. There is a wealth of info with enough "tongue in cheek" to keep things enjoyable. Also, in this world of text messages, it's nice to see that people can still write complete sentences.