Reply
Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 6,921
Registered: 08-16-2007
0

FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

 

Here's something a little different than the titles we usually feature here – Keith Melton's Blood Vice, the first installment of his Nightfall Syndicate series.

 

 

And here's why this title is intriguing to me – it's a small press release. So, the big question, for me, is: How does the quality of small press paranormal fantasy releases stack up against releases from the giant publishers? And what advantages – for the reader – are there in seeking out and reading small press stuff?

 

To help us with this question, Keith Melton himself has agreed to stop by throughout the month of February to chat about the publishing industry, cover art philosophy, and above all else his novel, which is published by Georgia-based Samhain Publishing.

 

 

The teaser on this novel is terrific: 

 

"Business has never been better for hit man Karl Vance. Boston is awash in mafia blood, and Vance has a certain fondness for blood. He’s a master vampire—one of the most powerful of his kind. Having sworn to never again feed on the blood of innocents, Karl preys instead on Boston’s criminal underworld. Which makes him a valuable asset to those who deal in death.

 

Maria Ricardi intends to use that asset to its full extent in order to gain power within her patriarchal crime family. Vance thinks he’s been hired to keep track of the family’s princess, but she’s got a plan to get her hands dirty and earn the respect she deserves. And she’s not above using their instant attraction to get what she wants.

 

That driving ambition draws the attention of a rival clan’s newest and most dangerous “consultant.” Alejandro Delgado, Vance’s centuries-old nemesis. Delgado zeroes in on the one chink in Vance’s armor—his fondness for the headstrong Maria.

 

When she becomes enslaved by Delgado’s unnatural kiss, only one thing is certain. Vance has to decide which he wants more. To settle the score—or rescue her soul."

 

Also, this tangential note, I've never read a book with a warning on the cover! Here's what's on the back of Blood Vice:

 

"Warning: Intense, graphic mafia-related violence, profanity, gangster slang, assassinations, fang punctures, explicit vampire sex, betrayal, greed, murder, gangland warfare, pervasive supernatural mayhem, large-scale explosions, and extremely expensive Italian suits."

 

So feel free to post any and all questions for Keith right here! It should be a interesting conversation....

 

Paul

 

 

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 6,921
Registered: 08-16-2007
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

Keith:

My first question is regarding cover art. we've been discussing it pretty in-depth around here lately and we've come to the conclusion that some big publishers just don't understand the audience – the whole tattooed female in leather pants wielding weapon thing. The philosophy of these big art departments and all of their "studies" is that these types of covers "work," that is, succeed in making potential readers pick them up. But it's becoming cliche now and boring to some extent.

 

Can you talk a little bit about the reasoning behind putting protag Karl Vance on the cover? What type of audience are you going for? And what is your philosophy regarding all of the formulaic paranormal fantasy covers out there right now?

 

Paul

 

Cover Image

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Distinguished Correspondent
KeithMelton
Posts: 88
Registered: 03-17-2009
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

Thanks Paul, it’s great to be here.

 

I’ve actually lurked on these forums for awhile—in fact, I first discovered them back in 2007 when you featured Kim Harrison and Vicki Pettersson. I must admit, I love the interactions between readers and authors.

 

I had a great time writing the warning on the book. All of Samhain Publishing’s books feature these, and the authors are often quite creative with them. I think it’s a brilliant idea, serving as both a hook and notice of content a reader might find objectionable.

 

Okay, now on to the tough questions. ^_^

Keith Melton
http://www.keithmelton.net
Distinguished Correspondent
KeithMelton
Posts: 88
Registered: 03-17-2009

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

[ Edited ]

"Keith:

My first question is regarding cover art. we've been discussing it pretty in-depth around here lately and we've come to the conclusion that some big publishers just don't understand the audience – the whole tattooed female in leather pants wielding weapon thing. The philosophy of these big art departments and all of their "studies" is that these types of covers "work," that is, succeed in making potential readers pick them up. But it's becoming cliche now and boring to some extent.

 

Can you talk a little bit about the reasoning behind putting protag Karl Vance on the cover? What type of audience are you going for? And what is your philosophy regarding all of the formulaic paranormal fantasy covers out there right now?

 

Paul"

 

I understand what the big art departments seek to achieve. At a glance a reader can see “Okay, female with tattoo and/or weapon of choice (knife, crossbow, flamethrower, enraged kitten, etc), facing away from the camera. Must be Urban Fantasy, let’s see what the blurb says.”

 

However, I think your comment about it trending toward cliché and to some extent becoming tired is also completely understandable. I think any element, over-used, loses effectiveness over time. Authors often go through great pains to come up with different, interesting protagonists—i.e. Rachel Morgan from The Hollows Series is very different from the character Gin Blanco of Jennifer Estep’s Spider’s Bite, just to throw a comparison out there. Yet, there’s a back view of Gin with a knife, and several of The Hollows books feature Rachel holding a blade. At first glance, these similar images might make it easy for me (as a reader) to mistakenly assume these characters all hold very tightly to a kind of UF female protagonist archetype, when they actually may move in wildly divergent directions, each unique to the author. That said, I think those character preconceptions can be easily fixed when/if the reader picks the book up to read, but it does seem to make it easy for similar covers to be lost in a sea of similar-appearing books.

 

I don’t have data, but it seems plausible that a swell of very similar covers might actually be an entry barrier to readers unfamiliar with UF/Paranormals, perhaps leading to the mistaken assumption that the books are “all the same.” Then again, all genre fiction may face this kind of barrier. As I said, I don’t have data, and the big art departments seem to have gathered data that indicate the style works for sales.

 

Now, onward to Karl Vance on the cover of Blood Vice. Samhain has a certain visual style to their covers they maintain with all their releases. The bulk of Samhain readers are interested in Paranormal Romance/Romance fiction, so their first thought is to appeal to this core audience. Blood Vice is firmly UF—there is a romantic subplot, but it is secondary to the main plot of the vampire and mafia war, etc—but I think the cover seeks to achieve a balance between both. A hook for the PNR readers with the sexy guy, but also a darker, more ominous feel (for example, the model’s shadowed face, looking down/away from the camera) to reflect the book’s gritty and dark atmosphere. However, my pleas to include an “I love Mom” tattoo on Karl’s chest were ignored, as was my request to include a caption reading “Vampires Too Sexy For Their Shirts!”

 

Okay, in the interest of total disclosure, I’ll admit I completely made that last sentence up.

I greatly admire the cover artist—Anne Cain—and was honored to have her do the cover for Blood Vice. I think she has excellent compositional skills, great use of texture, and an ability to really capture and convey emotion in her cover designs.

 

I feel my audience for Blood Vice is both men and women readers of Urban Fantasy, despite the guy on the cover who may or may not make readers more inclined to think they are getting vampires closer to JR Ward’s. That said, I did take a bunch of ribbing from a couple of my male readers who, ironically, indicated they would’ve preferred the heroine, Maria Ricardi, on the cover, facing away from the camera and holding a shotgun. And don’t forget the tattoo.

 

It would be very interesting for me to hear first impressions of this cover from readers on this forum. Does having a book that features a more "sexualized" image of a male on the front cover, regardless of how racy or tame the book might actually be, make it less or more likely for you to read the book? Or does it not matter?

Keith Melton
http://www.keithmelton.net
Inspired Wordsmith
LordRuthven
Posts: 1,334
Registered: 09-07-2007
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

Honestly, when I saw that cover online a couple of weeks ago, I thought it was a book geared towards a gay audience. There is a thriving sub-subgenre of gay vampire fiction, with covers not unlike this. While I understand Samhain has a core audience (I know a handful of their authors), it looked like gay fiction to me. So I passed it by until I saw it was going to be Paul's feature this month. It does sound like something I'd be interested in, so I am glad that Paul drew my attention to it.

 

I don't mean to come off as a jerk - just giving my two cents on what it says to me as a potential reader.

Derek Tatum
Distinguished Bibliophile
TiggerBear
Posts: 9,489
Registered: 02-12-2008
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

 


LordRuthven wrote:

Honestly, when I saw that cover online a couple of weeks ago, I thought it was a book geared towards a gay audience. There is a thriving sub-subgenre of gay vampire fiction, with covers not unlike this. While I understand Samhain has a core audience (I know a handful of their authors), it looked like gay fiction to me. So I passed it by until I saw it was going to be Paul's feature this month. It does sound like something I'd be interested in, so I am glad that Paul drew my attention to it.

 

I don't mean to come off as a jerk - just giving my two cents on what it says to me as a potential reader.


 

 

Ok I'm not taking this as you as a jerk. Just I have a question from your post. I know that you don't like more Romance type in our genre. But do you walk away even more if the sex type is not yours?

 

And everyone else, I'm curious, does the sex choice if it's different than yours, are you least likely to read that book?

Distinguished Correspondent
KeithMelton
Posts: 88
Registered: 03-17-2009
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton


LordRuthven wrote:

Honestly, when I saw that cover online a couple of weeks ago, I thought it was a book geared towards a gay audience. There is a thriving sub-subgenre of gay vampire fiction, with covers not unlike this. While I understand Samhain has a core audience (I know a handful of their authors), it looked like gay fiction to me. So I passed it by until I saw it was going to be Paul's feature this month. It does sound like something I'd be interested in, so I am glad that Paul drew my attention to it.

 

I don't mean to come off as a jerk - just giving my two cents on what it says to me as a potential reader.


@LordRuthven/Derek Tatum

 

No worries. Thank you very much for giving your two cents. It’s understandable how the cover might come across that way, especially without a female on it to show, at a glance, that it's M/F and not M/M.

Keith Melton
http://www.keithmelton.net
Distinguished Correspondent
KeithMelton
Posts: 88
Registered: 03-17-2009
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton


paulgoatallen wrote:

 

And here's why this title is intriguing to me – it's a small press release. So, the big question, for me, is: How does the quality of small press paranormal fantasy releases stack up against releases from the giant publishers? And what advantages – for the reader – are there in seeking out and reading small press stuff?

 

 

 

Paul

 

 


 

My first caveat would be that I won’t present a completely unbiased viewpoint in my answer, since I’m published by a small press, and I most definitely have a horse in the race.

 

Having said that, small presses have historically earned a large amount of respect with regard to literary fiction and academic writing. I would say in the case of genre fiction, much depends upon the small press itself—is it reputable, does it have a proven track record of producing quality fiction?—and upon the specific writer—is the quality of her/his prose at or above that of the larger market, were they signed/published before their storytelling skills had matured to an acceptable level?

 

However, the average reader won’t be interested in spending the time researching a small press, and they certainly shouldn’t be expected to. Gatekeepers of quality will always be needed. Or, if not exactly gatekeepers (since the term brings to mind a certain censorship or restriction of ideas and information), then trusted voices, reviewers, etc, who can bring small press offerings to the attention of readers who may, or may not, be willing to take a chance on a less well-known author. Word of mouth can play a huge role, which is why sites like Goodreads or forums such as this one can play an important role in validating the quality of a work that might be worth scoping out.

 

The advantage for the reader in seeking out and reading small press offerings lies in discovering potentially diverse writing, perhaps hidden gems that orbit just outside mainstream publishing. A writer may seek out a small press when she/he receives replies from agents or publishers to a submission basically saying: “We love the writing. We love the story. Unfortunately, no one’s buying books about magic in a steam-technology world. We don’t think there’s a market.” The market may develop in time, but it may not exist when the writer is trying to place his/her manuscript. Publishing houses like to be at the crest of a new trend, but there are bottom lines to meet, and not everyone involved in the buying/acquisition chain is purely concerned about "art," or even willing to gamble on a manuscript that may not be a neat fit for an established market. After all, this is business. That is not a judgmental statement, just a statement of reality.

 

A small press may be better positioned to take a risk on a piece of writing they believe in, especially one in which the publisher believes might fill a niche in the market not big enough for the major publishers to pursue. Also, in these difficult times, small presses may become the refuge of midlist authors who are dropped by larger publishing houses for whatever reason, perhaps not meeting a return on investment acceptable to the publisher. A small publisher may be able to satisfy the demand from the author’s fans with small print runs and may be willing to invest in an author’s career for a longer amount of time. That last is pure speculation, however, and may be detached from reality.

 

As an aside, I’m a reader as well as a writer. We’ve all purchased books we thought would be good and have been disappointed in them for various reasons. Regardless of where an author may stand on the Google Book Settlement, one thing I do like about it from a reader’s point of view is the ability for a potential reader to read or skim a large portion of the fiction book and judge the quality of the prose/characterization/story. If I can’t hook the reader in the first third of the book, the failure is mine as a writer, and the reader can walk away with no loss except a few minutes of his/her time. I think this, in addition to sample chapters and significant excerpts, can also help a reader determine the quality (or lack of quality) of any fiction writer regardless of whether the writer was published by a major publishing house or a small press.

 

The editors at Samhain work from the Chicago Manual of Style. Manuscripts go through several rounds of developmental editing as well as copyediting. The people at the publishing house are dedicated to turning out quality product they believe readers will enjoy. However, at the end of the day, the writer and the writer alone is responsible for winning and keeping readers.

 

Wow, all that just to say: “Yes, there is quality writing at small presses worth seeking out.”

Where’s my editor when I need her? ^_^

Keith Melton
http://www.keithmelton.net
Distinguished Correspondent
KeithMelton
Posts: 88
Registered: 03-17-2009

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton


TiggerBear wrote:

 

And everyone else, I'm curious, does the sex choice if it's different than yours, are you least likely to read that book?

@TiggerBear

 

Interesting question.

 

To me, the sexual orientation of the characters makes no difference. Good writing is good writing. Great characters are great characters. One of my all-time favorite characters is Milo Sturgis, a gay homicide detective, by one of my favorite authors, Jonathan Kellerman. That character is brilliant and fascinating.

Keith Melton
http://www.keithmelton.net
Inspired Wordsmith
LordRuthven
Posts: 1,334
Registered: 09-07-2007
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

 


TiggerBear wrote:

 

Ok I'm not taking this as you as a jerk. Just I have a question from your post. I know that you don't like more Romance type in our genre. But do you walk away even more if the sex type is not yours?

 


 

 

Well, I do want to clarify the romance angle... my POV has modified somewhat from what it used to be. Romance is not my favorite genre, but if a romance novel has good reviews, likable characters, and the supernatural aspect is well-done, I am not opposed to giving it a shot. I just hate some of the romance archetypes, i.e. sexy bad boy characters.

 

As for homosexual characters - there's a difference between a book with GBLT leads and gay fiction. Henry Fitzroy, Saint-Germain, and Lestat (among many others) are bisexual. Outside of the vampire genre, Clive Barker uses gay characters and themes in his work. The use of GBLT characters - including (especially) ones that aren't "neutered" - is a reflection of reality. But fiction written expressly for a gay audience - especially when it is sexually explicit - holds no appeal to me because I am straight.

 

Good topic, perhaps deserving of its own thread. Paul?

Derek Tatum
Inspired Wordsmith
LordRuthven
Posts: 1,334
Registered: 09-07-2007
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

[ Edited ]

 


KeithMelton wrote:

 

To me, the sexual orientation of the characters makes no difference. Good writing is good writing. Great characters are great characters.


 

QFT.

 

Derek Tatum
Moderator
becke_davis
Posts: 29,319
Registered: 10-19-2006

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

You got me at "pervasive supernatural mayhem!" Wow, I'm so glad I stopped by. Looks like my TBR pile is going to grow by one more book. Unless this is epub? Either way, I'm going to read it.

 

Paul, you introduced me to paranormals and urban fantasy when I wasn't sure I wanted to dabble in those bloody and mysterious waters. You haven't steered me wrong yet, which is why said TBR pile is going to sink through the floor before long. I never fail to find interesting books and meet fascinating authors here!

 

Keith, I had the pleasure of meeting your wife in the virtual world. (I won't go into details but she was not only patient but absolutely lovely, if that doesn't sound simpering. Okay, she was really nice -- is that better?)

 

The question of small pub vs. big pub is something I think about a lot these days. Many of my friends are writers for small pubs, and I am reading books by the lesser known pubs more and more. I used to think an NY publisher was an assurance of quality, but that's clearly not the case. I've come across glaring typos and all kinds of other mistakes in books from big publishers, and really high quality work in books by small pubs.

 

I'm not saying there aren't some excellent books coming from New York and some total crap coming from small pubs, because there are plenty of those, too. But I think the smaller pubs are becoming growing contenders in the fight for readers, and they're succeeding by bringing in some really good authors.

Distinguished Correspondent
KeithMelton
Posts: 88
Registered: 03-17-2009
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton


becke_davis wrote:

You got me at "pervasive supernatural mayhem!" Wow, I'm so glad I stopped by. Looks like my TBR pile is going to grow by one more book. Unless this is epub? Either way, I'm going to read it.

 

 

Keith, I had the pleasure of meeting your wife in the virtual world. (I won't go into details but she was not only patient but absolutely lovely, if that doesn't sound simpering. Okay, she was really nice -- is that better?)

 

The question of small pub vs. big pub is something I think about a lot these days. Many of my friends are writers for small pubs, and I am reading books by the lesser known pubs more and more. I used to think an NY publisher was an assurance of quality, but that's clearly not the case. I've come across glaring typos and all kinds of other mistakes in books from big publishers, and really high quality work in books by small pubs.

 

I'm not saying there aren't some excellent books coming from New York and some total crap coming from small pubs, because there are plenty of those, too. But I think the smaller pubs are becoming growing contenders in the fight for readers, and they're succeeding by bringing in some really good authors.


@becke_davis

Thanks for your interest! Blood Vice is available in both print and various e-formats, depending on your preference.

 

I read your words to my wife and you clearly made her day. I actually first met my wife in the virtual world, on the old Del Rey Writer’s Workshop in 2000-2001.

 

I think the fairest, most accurate thing that can be said is: there are great books coming out of New York, and there are flawed books coming out of New York (and a wide range within those two poles). There are great books coming out from small presses, and there are flawed books coming out from small presses (as well as a wide range between those two poles). I’d only encourage readers to keep an open mind and judge the writing and story itself, on its own merits or lack thereof.

 

I’m feeling a bit under the weather today—the kids decided to share a wonderful virus they found at school—so please be patient if it takes me a little longer to reply.

Keith Melton
http://www.keithmelton.net
Moderator
becke_davis
Posts: 29,319
Registered: 10-19-2006
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

Oh no, I remember those days. Whenever the kids got sick, I got sick. I'm so glad they are all grown up now! I hope you're feeling better soon.

 

That's fascinating that you met your wife in the virtual world. My husband and I met before there was a virtual world, but we both play on Facebook, Twitter and MySpace. When I went to RWA National last year, I was amazed how many people I knew -- and who knew me -- from Facebook. It's also helped me reconnect with friends in England, Scotland and Australia, as well as old school friends.

 

It's a whole new world. And it's filled with demons, zombies, vamps, shifters and all kinds of interesting things!

Inspired Correspondent
PinkPetunia
Posts: 64
Registered: 02-01-2010
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

Hi all (and hi Keith! :-)

 

This brings up some really interesting questions, regarding a book's cover art and readers' expectations. As a cover artist (not for Keith's publisher, though), I have some firm goals in mind when I'm designing a cover. And the publisher and artist make some definite assumptions about how they believe readers will respond. So it's interesting to me to hear readers talk about this.

 

So how does a cover really affect whether or not you pick up a book? In this case, the cover turned off a male fantasy reader, even though from the looks of things, he's likely to be the target audience. But I also know from various reviewers and online lists, etc. that alot of female romance readers liked the book, which I didn't expect, since there are some definite elements in Blood Vice that are verboten to a strictly romance audience (which of course just proves that people are alot more open to differences in character and theme than many publishers often give them credit for).

 

Do you think as a reader, you'd be more likely to pick up something different but interesting, even if it skirts the edges of being another sub-genre? Or are you more likely to stick to the cover that shouts, "I'm one of those popular UF books" and then let the blurb or other content tell you how it's different?

 

 

Annie Melton
Inspired Correspondent
PinkPetunia
Posts: 64
Registered: 02-01-2010
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

 


becke_davis wrote:

 

Keith, I had the pleasure of meeting your wife in the virtual world....

 

 


 

 

*Waving!* Hi Becke!!

 

 


becke_davis wrote:

I'm not saying there aren't some excellent books coming from New York and some total crap coming from small pubs, because there are plenty of those, too. But I think the smaller pubs are becoming growing contenders in the fight for readers, and they're succeeding by bringing in some really good authors.


 

 

I think so to. There are definitely some good authors working in small presses, and I think there's more room in small presses to try something a little different, a little riskier, than might be acceptable at larger houses. But like you said, there's good and bad in both.

 

Annie Melton
Moderator
becke_davis
Posts: 29,319
Registered: 10-19-2006
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

Hi Pink Petunia! I didn't recognize you straight away. I've been hopping today at the Mystery board. Stop by if you get a chance!

Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 6,921
Registered: 08-16-2007
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

 


PinkPetunia wrote:

I think so to. There are definitely some good authors working in small presses, and I think there's more room in small presses to try something a little different, a little riskier, than might be acceptable at larger houses. But like you said, there's good and bad in both.

 


 

 

Annie:

BINGO. That's why I love small press releases. I've reviewed more than 6,000 genre fiction titles and I have to tell you that some of my all-time favorite books have come from small presses. But, yes, I've read some really, really bad stuff as well.but, for me at least, that's the thrill of picking up a small press offering....

 

You sound like you know what you're talking about. Do you work for a small press?

 

Paul

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Moderator
becke_davis
Posts: 29,319
Registered: 10-19-2006
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton

Paul, Keith and Pink Petunia --

 

Do you think it makes a different what genre you write in, when it comes to going with a small or large press?

 

I don't see a lot of women's fiction, non-fiction or straight suspense in the smaller pubs, but I see a LOT of all kinds of romance, erotica, romantic suspense, steam punk, urban fantasy and all kinds of sub-genres that push the envelope. 

 

That's one reason I've been reading more books by small publishers -- I think we're more likely to find books that are new and different there, while it seems as if a lot of the NY publishers are playing it safe.

Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 6,921
Registered: 08-16-2007
0

Re: FEBRUARY FEATURE #1: Blood Vice by Keith Melton


becke_davis wrote:

Paul, Keith and Pink Petunia --

 

Do you think it makes a different what genre you write in, when it comes to going with a small or large press?

 

I don't see a lot of women's fiction, non-fiction or straight suspense in the smaller pubs, but I see a LOT of all kinds of romance, erotica, romantic suspense, steam punk, urban fantasy and all kinds of sub-genres that push the envelope. 

 

That's one reason I've been reading more books by small publishers -- I think we're more likely to find books that are new and different there, while it seems as if a lot of the NY publishers are playing it safe.


Becke:
I'm not a big reader of women's fiction but I've read lots of "niche" fiction via small presses – paranormal erotica, splatterpunk horror, bizzaro fiction, fringy fantasy, utopian SF, etc. What I don't see – and this just makes my blood boil – is poetry.
Okay, I know this thread is about Keith and his stellar novel but I just have to get this out and then we can move on. What's the bottom line of any publisher, be it Samhain Publishing or St. Martin's? To sell books. To make $$$, right? Back before I got married, I was a performance poet and read my work everywhere I could – high schools, coffee houses, bars, craft fairs, etc. I even opened up for heavy metal bands in dives throughout Upstate New York. Well, during that time I was trying to get a collection published but no agent would even consider looking at my stuff because "poetry doesn't sell." I got that over and over again. And you know what? For the most part, they're right. I managed bookstores for eight years and, yes, I know poetry doesn't sell well as a category. But I knew my poetry would sell – I had amassed a following from my shows so I decided to shell out quite a substantial amount of cash to self-publish (ie: print) a hardcover volume of my work. I sold it for $20 at my shows and guess what? I moved almost 5,000 copies. "Poetry doesn't sell." Say what?
So fast forward 20 years. I've been reviewing books fulltime and making babies with my wife. I thought about trying once again to get a real publisher to publish my poetry so I sent out queries to a bunch of agents and small publishers and do you know what they said? "Poetry doesn't sell. Good luck with it!"
I suppose I'm attracted to small publishers for the same reason that I enjoy paranormal fantasy. There really are no boundaries. anything – and I do mean anything – can transpire within the pages. And that's why I love poetry – poetry can be about anything. Its boundaries are limitless. I find it interesting that poetry can be so stigmatized while virtually every genre category under the sun is being published....
Is poetry really dead?
Okay, thanks. I feel better now.

Paul


"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky