Reply
Distinguished Bibliophile
dalnewt
Posts: 2,725
Registered: ‎06-16-2009
0 Kudos

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

[ Edited ]

I'm enjoying this book so far. I love the hunt scenes with Anita and Edward in the SUV surrounded by woods. LKH even managed to convert a 'booty call' trip into the Red Tiger headquarters into a suspenseful sequence ending in good fighting action and a surprise twist. This story is reminiscent of the earlier works. I loved Bloody Bones, and so far some of this story vaguely reminds me of that book. 

 

I love the hard edged style in which the first half of this story is written. It's all about Anita and Edward trying to stop the Harlequin while being unable to tell anyone else about them. And, to complicate the hunt, there's the mystery of why the Harlequin are trying to capture Anita.

 

I'm enjoying Edward's character more than Anita's. Given her experience, sometimes Anita's reactions seem too emotional and/or too young. On the other hand Edward has exactly the right balance of pragmatism and cold rationalism for an experienced killer. Given her experience, Anita should be a bit more like Edward and less vulnerable. Maybe LKH thinks that Anita is more accessible if she shows human vulnerability, but I just find it to be annoying and affected at times.

 

For some reason, I hate how Anita refers to her male harem back home as her 'sweeties'. I just can't stand it for some reason. I guess I basically don't approve of feeding off of lust and the whole male harem thing. Plus, given her lifestyle, Anita's prudishness about Edward's nudity and the thought of having to have sex with him are ludicrous. LKH should realize that you have to let go of all pretense at sexual morals when you make your main character a lust feeding, male harem keeping succubus. Otherwise, you just end up writing ridiculous reactions that don't jive with the reality of the character you've created.

 

Unfortunately, I just hit the sex scene which is a cross between pity sex and lust with way too much 'splainin' going on. (Note, I quit reading this series because of the lack of good mystery/crime narratives and the meaningless sex scenes.) I'm in the middle of another meaningless and slow-moving sex scene now, and I can only hope that it ends quickly. I really hope the story returns to a suspenseful crime tale.

Distinguished Bibliophile
dalnewt
Posts: 2,725
Registered: ‎06-16-2009

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton


dalnewt wrote:

I'm enjoying this book so far. I love the hunt scenes with Anita and Edward in the SUV surrounded by woods. LKH even managed to convert a 'booty call' trip into the Red Tiger headquarters into a suspenseful sequence ending in good fighting action and a surprise twist. This story is reminiscent of the earlier works. I loved Bloody Bones, and so far some of this story vaguely reminds me of that book.

 


Sigh, the second half of the book wasn't very good IMO. See below a copy of my most recent post about the book in the What Are You Reading thread:




This book seemed to loose intensity in the last half. The book lost pace with the overlong, wordy and meaningless sex. Then, the narrative took off on tangents that had nothing to do with the central hunt. Thank god Olaf was mixed up into that portion of the narrative, because without him there would have been no tension to the story whatsoever.

 

As the book nears completion a twist occurs which is very predictable. Although there are flashes of urgency with that twist, it really was mostly bluff and potential threats with hardly any action. Then, the story reaches a totally anti-climatic apex that relies upon metaphysical power rather than physical confrontation, and the story ends in a cursory finish that's very unsatisfactory. 

 

If only the book had maintained the hunt, but instead it veered toward emotional and metaphysical crap. In the end, it simply wasn't satisfying. This book had a split personality. I really like the initial hard-nosed narrative where Anita and Edward are hunting the killers, but the second half had no pace, focus or real climax. Note, in one part I felt like LKH was proselytizing the benefits of polyamorous sex in a very boring and irritating way. 

 

I was hoping that this book would set the series on a course toward once again becoming an exceptional paranormal mystery/crime series. Instead, the book is a confused jumble with a split personality and no satisfactory conclusion.


Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 7,313
Registered: ‎08-16-2007

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

 


dalnewt wrote:

dalnewt wrote:

I'm enjoying this book so far. I love the hunt scenes with Anita and Edward in the SUV surrounded by woods. LKH even managed to convert a 'booty call' trip into the Red Tiger headquarters into a suspenseful sequence ending in good fighting action and a surprise twist. This story is reminiscent of the earlier works. I loved Bloody Bones, and so far some of this story vaguely reminds me of that book.

 


Sigh, the second half of the book wasn't very good IMO. See below a copy of my most recent post about the book in the What Are You Reading thread:




This book seemed to loose intensity in the last half. The book lost pace with the overlong, wordy and meaningless sex. Then, the narrative took off on tangents that had nothing to do with the central hunt. Thank god Olaf was mixed up into that portion of the narrative, because without him there would have been no tension to the story whatsoever.

 

As the book nears completion a twist occurs which is very predictable. Although there are flashes of urgency with that twist, it really was mostly bluff and potential threats with hardly any action. Then, the story reaches a totally anti-climatic apex that relies upon metaphysical power rather than physical confrontation, and the story ends in a cursory finish that's very unsatisfactory. 

 

If only the book had maintained the hunt, but instead it veered toward emotional and metaphysical crap. In the end, it simply wasn't satisfying. This book had a split personality. I really like the initial hard-nosed narrative where Anita and Edward are hunting the killers, but the second half had no pace, focus or real climax. Note, in one part I felt like LKH was proselytizing the benefits of polyamorous sex in a very boring and irritating way. 

 

I was hoping that this book would set the series on a course toward once again becoming an exceptional paranormal mystery/crime series. Instead, the book is a confused jumble with a split personality and no satisfactory conclusion.



I had a little bit of a different response, dalnewt. I actually liked the stripped down narrative – as compared to some of the previous novels – and I thought LKH really did a good job in making the sex not just "supernatural porn" but very much tied to Anita's metaphysical needs.The sex is so much more than just physical intercourse.

 

One sequence in Hit List, in particular, summed it up perfectly:

 

“It was, in the end, about love. The love of a lover, of friends, and of partners, of people that I never wanted to lose, and wanted to wake up beside every damn day. It was about home. Home wasn’t a place, or a building, or a tropical night full of flowers and rain. Love made home not out of boards and walls and furniture, but of hands to hold, and smiles to share, and the warmth of that body cuddled around you in the dark.”

 

That said, I wasn't thrilled with the ending – in fact, I went back and reread the last few chapters because I thought I had miised something.

 

I've written a very in-depth blog about my feelings about this series – which I'm sure some will disagree with – and I've just sent a few questions to LKH's publicist so I'm hoping HOPING to post my blog and the interview together asap. It should be very interesting!!!

 

Paul

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Distinguished Bibliophile
dalnewt
Posts: 2,725
Registered: ‎06-16-2009

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

[ Edited ]

paulgoatallen wrote:

 

I had a little bit of a different response, dalnewt. I actually liked the stripped down narrative – as compared to some of the previous novels – and I thought LKH really did a good job in making the sex not just "supernatural porn" but very much tied to Anita's metaphysical needs.The sex is so much more than just physical intercourse.

 

One sequence in Hit List, in particular, summed it up perfectly:

 

“It was, in the end, about love. The love of a lover, of friends, and of partners, of people that I never wanted to lose, and wanted to wake up beside every damn day. It was about home. Home wasn’t a place, or a building, or a tropical night full of flowers and rain. Love made home not out of boards and walls and furniture, but of hands to hold, and smiles to share, and the warmth of that body cuddled around you in the dark.”

 

That said, I wasn't thrilled with the ending – in fact, I went back and reread the last few chapters because I thought I had miised something.

 

I've written a very in-depth blog about my feelings about this series – which I'm sure some will disagree with – and I've just sent a few questions to LKH's publicist so I'm hoping HOPING to post my blog and the interview together asap. It should be very interesting!!!

 

Paul


I haven't read the immediately preceding novels--I haven't read any novels since the Harlequin so I don't really have your references for comparison.  I do remember that the books I read after OB contained an ever increasing internal monologue (of justifications and explanations) that seemed to go on and on. This book certainly didn't have any of that, so I approve of ditching that fruitless circle.

 

IMO whenever sex occurs w/out love or some other strong relationship bond, it's pretty emotionally meaningless. Anita didn't love and had no relationship with Ethan. She and her arduer were attracted to him, but love wasn't there. She even tells him that she doesn't love him, and that he will basically be last in a long line of lovers and f**k buddies. <Shrugs> That's just not my idea of meaningful sex. And all the talk! I want a sex scene to be the culmination of deep emotions one person feels for another, not a disclaimer! And it seemed to drag a bit. To me the sex scene was neither sensual nor emotionally compelling.

 

Note, although I'm glad Edward and Anita weren't forced to have sex (because I'm afraid of corrupting Edward's character and his relationship with Anita), it would have been much more momentous to me if she and Edward had done the deed because at least they have a real emotional bond. So, while I was dreading that possibility, I also realized that Edward would just get the job done and Anita would actually be f**cking someone she truly cares about.

 

I hate the arduer. As far as that metaphysical power is concerned I really don't want to hear about it. To me the arduer represents much of what went wrong in this series. I was so glad that Anita seemed to have freed herself, but instead LKH brought the arduer back into the tale in a way that caused Anita to basically have 'pity' sex with an unhappy guy who she and the arduer were attracted to. It was like she was doing him a favor, and she really was. But what kind of basis is that for deep relationship? And, where is the parity in that? Anita will always be the stronger person in that relationship.  

 

As to that portion of text you quote--to me it's sort of a proselytizing defense for Anita's poly lifestyle. The words themselves are well composed, but what's behind them is just no good for me. I just can't get into a paragraph singing the praises of the love waiting at home, when the reality of that love is what Anita has and does. Does that make me narrow minded? Maybe, but so be it. I really don't like harems of the female or male persuasion--I think it's contrary to human nature. (And, I was somewhat appalled and creeped out by Anita's ongoing sexual relationship with a 17 year old high schooler.)     

Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 7,313
Registered: ‎08-16-2007
0 Kudos

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

dalnewt:

Excellent comments, especially regarding the "sex" thing. That would make for a great roundtable discussion – I'm hoping LKH can do the interview because one of my questions was on that exact topic! We shall see soon...

 

Paul

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 7,313
Registered: ‎08-16-2007
0 Kudos

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

 

Hit List #1 on the NYT Bestsellers hardcover fiction list!

 

 

http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/hardcover-fiction/list.html

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Wordsmith
MADIS
Posts: 289
Registered: ‎02-27-2009

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton


paulgoatallen wrote:

I've written a very in-depth blog about my feelings about this series – which I'm sure some will disagree with – and I've just sent a few questions to LKH's publicist so I'm hoping HOPING to post my blog and the interview together asap. It should be very interesting!!!


Any chance this is coming out soon?  Patience is a virtue I do not possess.  I am very much looking forward to this blog post!

Scribe
SciFiCanuck
Posts: 2,039
Registered: ‎03-18-2008

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

Well I just finished the book today...I felt a little like nothing happened in this book and everything happened all at the same time.  Some of the scenes where they are talking drive me a little crazy...they go on and on about simple stuff and it takes up a whole chapter, LOL!  I love what you said a few posts up Paul about her talking about home and what it REALLY means.  :-)  So true.

 

So now that she defeated Mommy Dearest, I'm wondering how it's going to affect her...with the warning she gave Anita and Anita pretty much brushed it off. I think that would make the story more interesting down the line if Anita actually turned darker and they had to "fix" her.  Or then again, maybe it's just me?  LOL

 

Love having Edward back and Bernardo...Olaf...well I'm wondering if there is going to be a book down the line or sooner, where he comes after Anita and she will have to kill him.  Very interesting for sure.

 

Well another AB novel to add to the shelf...I am REALLY looking forward to her next Merry Gentry book!!  It's been so long, I'm dying to have her story continue!  :-)

 

Cheers!

My name is Teresa, and I'm a bookaholic
Current book(s): Falling Blind by Shannon K. Butcher (Sentinel Wars #7)
Just finished: Kitty Rocks the House by Carrie Vaughn (Kitty Norville #11)
Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 7,313
Registered: ‎08-16-2007
0 Kudos

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

 


MADIS wrote:

paulgoatallen wrote:

I've written a very in-depth blog about my feelings about this series – which I'm sure some will disagree with – and I've just sent a few questions to LKH's publicist so I'm hoping HOPING to post my blog and the interview together asap. It should be very interesting!!!


Any chance this is coming out soon?  Patience is a virtue I do not possess.  I am very much looking forward to this blog post!


The blog is done – I'm just waiting to hear back from Laurell. I guess she JUST got back to St. Louis after doing some tour stuff so I'm trying to be patient too!  :smileyhappy:
Paul

 

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Distinguished Bibliophile
dalnewt
Posts: 2,725
Registered: ‎06-16-2009

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

[ Edited ]

paulgoatallen wrote:

 

Hit List #1 on the NYT Bestsellers hardcover fiction list!

 

 

http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/hardcover-fiction/list.html


IMO, the #1 ranking shows how much of a potential fan base this series has if you add up all the disenchanted readers, like me, who started reading the series when it provided paranormal mystery/supernatural action plots but discontinued after it became so sexual together with those fans who adjusted to all the emotional drama, multiple sexual partners, metaphysical stuff and burgeoning cast of the later books. I read this book because of the Publishers Weekly review quoted below. I didn't want to miss out on a book that resembled the initial books that I loved.

 

Publishers Weekly

As punchy as her first foray, Anita Blake's 20th adventure (after 2010s Bullet) finds the intrepid vampire hunter far from her familiar St. Louis environs. Someone is slaughtering weretigers just outside of Tacoma. When Anita recognizes the handiwork of the Harlequin, ninja-like paranormal assassins, she suspects they're in the employ of the Mother of All Darkness, the legendary vampire queen who wants to reincarnate herself in Anita's body and take advantage of her mingled vampire and lycanthrope bloodlines. Complicating matters are a marshal who detests Anita for no apparent reason and a psychopathic deputy who wants to kill her. The action occasionally bogs down in the sexual trysts Anita indulges in to stoke her supernatural abilities, but for the most part, Hamilton goes back to basics and delivers a sleek, hard-boiled page-turner. (June)

Contributor
dare46
Posts: 18
Registered: ‎08-04-2010
0 Kudos

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

Have to be honest.  Given up on her.  I bought her first books as they came out but honestly the sex is stupid.  If there is sex is has to be for the purspose of the plot.  These books are actually porn.  In fact playboy is less explict in their discriptions than her books.  I loved the Gentry books but the same thing happened.  Honestly i think she should conclude the series with a book with an actual plot.  Move on to another.  I am waiting for more reviews before i consent to use my eyes on this one. So far not convinced.  I hope someone is telling her an age old truth ...everything in a book has to be intragal to the plot.  This failure seems to happen so often with paranormal writers though!  The most disappointing thing is the loss of potiental of the series...it really burns me

Distinguished Bibliophile
dalnewt
Posts: 2,725
Registered: ‎06-16-2009
0 Kudos

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton


dare46 wrote:

Have to be honest.  Given up on her.  I bought her first books as they came out but honestly the sex is stupid.  If there is sex is has to be for the purspose of the plot.  These books are actually porn.  In fact playboy is less explict in their discriptions than her books.  I loved the Gentry books but the same thing happened.  Honestly i think she should conclude the series with a book with an actual plot.  Move on to another.  I am waiting for more reviews before i consent to use my eyes on this one. So far not convinced.  I hope someone is telling her an age old truth ...everything in a book has to be intragal to the plot.  This failure seems to happen so often with paranormal writers though!  The most disappointing thing is the loss of potiental of the series...it really burns me


There is only one sex scene in this book, and it does fit into the plot in terms of the new paramour actually helping Anita fight the big, bad darkness due to his 'arduer' based link with Anita. The sex scene itself didn't do it for me because it had no emotional weight whatsoever. 

 

Portions of the first half of the book I enjoyed, I could tolerate the sex scene although I rolled my eyes a lot. Then, the narrative went off on a bodyguard tangent. Thankfully Olaf was around to add some tension. I also enjoyed Bernardo and his hotness. (It's funny how the humans are much more appealing to me in this series than the genrally submissive supes. Guess I don't like submissive guys who fawn all over Anita.) After the boring bodyguard descriptions and a blah portion of the text dedicated to one of Anita's 'brides' named Nick, a very predictable twist occurs. I could see it coming a mile away. The characters were idiots to fall for it. Finally, the conflict ends too soon and too easily with some bluffs, threats, inconsequential killings and an overused metaphysical power that defeated many a foe in the past. It was totally anti-climatic. 

 

In short it wasn't the sex that made this book unsatisfactory, it was the way the story veered into boring territory and then didn't deliver in terms of the conflict.

Contributor
dare46
Posts: 18
Registered: ‎08-04-2010
0 Kudos

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

Thinking about it LKH should have Anita lose her soul.  I mean in the first parts of the series there was a lot of chatter about monsters(vampires etc.)  It could bring a lot of angst to Anita who overall has become a very 2D character.  

 

Personally I think LKH is  now only writing for the money.  Her first books were less well written, in that they were grammerically and stucturally less sound but they certainly were more interesting and heartfelt.  Or maybe it is that we have so much choice now in the paranormal field that we are becomeing more critical.

Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 7,313
Registered: ‎08-16-2007
0 Kudos

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

 


dare46 wrote:

Thinking about it LKH should have Anita lose her soul.


Well, that very well could happen – but now after what happened in Hit List, I'd lower the chances a bit...

 

Paul

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Wordsmith
MADIS
Posts: 289
Registered: ‎02-27-2009
0 Kudos

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton


paulgoatallen wrote:

 


MADIS wrote:

paulgoatallen wrote:

I've written a very in-depth blog about my feelings about this series – which I'm sure some will disagree with – and I've just sent a few questions to LKH's publicist so I'm hoping HOPING to post my blog and the interview together asap. It should be very interesting!!!


Any chance this is coming out soon?  Patience is a virtue I do not possess.  I am very much looking forward to this blog post!


The blog is done – I'm just waiting to hear back from Laurell. I guess she JUST got back to St. Louis after doing some tour stuff so I'm trying to be patient too!  :smileyhappy:
Paul

 


(sigh) Okay.  I guess I will just spend my time kicking a stone into the curb and chanting "I am having no fun" until I have something better to do. :smileysad:

Distinguished Bibliophile
dalnewt
Posts: 2,725
Registered: ‎06-16-2009
0 Kudos

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

[ Edited ]

dare46 wrote:

Thinking about it LKH should have Anita lose her soul.  I mean in the first parts of the series there was a lot of chatter about monsters(vampires etc.)  It could bring a lot of angst to Anita who overall has become a very 2D character.  

 

Personally I think LKH is  now only writing for the money.  Her first books were less well written, in that they were grammerically and stucturally less sound but they certainly were more interesting and heartfelt.  Or maybe it is that we have so much choice now in the paranormal field that we are becomeing more critical.


I wonder what new villain will emerge in this series? Since this series hasn't featured demons much, there's always the possibility of a demon. Plus, a reanimated ghoul lord or powerful/crazy necromancer would good. Of course it looks like JC will be engulfed in vampire politics, so it might just be other vamp(s). 

 

I just hope that LKH realizes that her focus on an action/mystery/crime plot reaped her rewards.

Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 7,313
Registered: ‎08-16-2007
0 Kudos

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

Okay, I had to wait a while but Laurell finally came through! The link below is to my blog about Hit List and the interview with LKH!there were some real fascinating responses – my favorite LKH answer was this:

 

PGA: We’re in the midst of a glorious Golden Age of paranormal fantasy. It’s the fastest growing category in all of fiction and is continually redefining itself with new releases that explore and expand its boundaries – in my mind, it’s nothing short of a genre fiction revolution. The potential for this fusion of genre elements – fantasy, romance, mystery, horror, etc. – is just limitless. Is there a sense of motherly pride knowing that your Anita Blake sequence primed the pump for all of this?

 

LKH: Motherly pride? Hmm, I hadn't thought about it like that. *laughs* I am certainly astonished that a type of book that I was told would never sell back in late 1980s/early 1990s has become the genre that, arguably, saved publishing in these rather dire times. The first Anita Blake novel, Guilty Pleasures, was rejected over 200 times. Editors told me the vampire genre was dead, or that mixed genre didn't sell. They had no idea how to market a book that mingled so much in one package.



 

Want to read more? Just follow the link below!

 

Paul

 

http://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com/t5/Explorations-The-BN-SciFi-and/The-Mother-Of-All-Paranormal-Fa...

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Moderator
paulgoatallen
Posts: 7,313
Registered: ‎08-16-2007

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

When I hear the Anita Blake saga referred to as supernatural porn or mindless sex or some other derogatory term, it bothers me because, although there are numerous (well written, I might add) erotic novels out there that could be considered supernatural porn, the sex in the Anita Blake novels is so much more than just physical intercourse. There is a healing, therapeutic, metaphysical element that I find refreshing and enlightening. In Hit List, there is a wonderfully poetic sequence that sums up the significance of the sexual intimacy in the Anita Blake saga beautifully:

 

“It was, in the end, about love. The love of a lover, of friends, and of partners, of people that I never wanted to lose, and wanted to wake up beside every damn day. It was about home. Home wasn’t a place, or a building, or a tropical night full of flowers and rain. Love made home not out of boards and walls and furniture, but of hands to hold, and smiles to share, and the warmth of that body cuddled around you in the dark.”

"There never can be a man so lost as one who is lost in the vast and intricate corridors of his own lonely mind, where none may reach and none may save..." – Isaac Asimov, Pebble in the Sky
Wordsmith
3monstersmom
Posts: 870
Registered: ‎03-04-2009

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

This really was a book that slapped me in the face.  I've been a longtime fan of LKH, hell the woman brought me into the genre and I can not be more thankful for that, but I am guilty of making comments about this series jumping the shark.  I still think she did jump the shark, but then in true LKH style she found that shark, brutally killed it, and then served it up as soup for naysayer's like me to have something to choke on when reading Hit List.  Now I find myself in an odd position, for the first time in a long time I feel protective again of this series.  There is a sudden defensiveness driving my arguments:  The sex is there for a reason, damn it!  It takes a lot of work to be a bad-a** killer, let the woman have a few sensitive moments.  Yes, there is an abundance of characters but it's a 20 book series people, it takes a lot of characters to keep that many books interesting.  This list can keep going, but I figure you get the point.

 

While Hit List was an enjoyable read and felt like a return to a more solid Anita, the ending was anti-climatic.  It seemed like there was a chapter or two missing from it that the editors or LKH forgot to put in.  We did get a few future story lines laid out.  Edward and Peter?  OLAF?  Possible repercussions over the final fight scene with the Mother of All Darkness?  Did I mention OLAF?  All I know is that when book #21 is released, I won't be letting it gather dust in my TBR pile.

Inspired Correspondent
Lineola
Posts: 56
Registered: ‎05-23-2011

Re: JUNE FEATURE #1: Hit List by Laurell K. Hamilton

I enjoyed Hit List a lot, though I must admit to be in the category of folks that read the end, then went back and re-read three chapters because I thought I missed something! 

 

I am a huge fan of the Anita Blake series-it is The Series that got me interested in urban/paranormal. I was firmly a hard sci-fi, fantasy girl before and never read urban or even mystery.  I have to say, I enjoy both the early mystery-crime part of the series and the later belly-gazing ones.  I sometimes hate that I have to qualify my recommendation for the series, "this is a great series, great author,but if you are prudish about sex scenes at some point you have to stop".  I personally find the development of the Anita character fascinating in the later books--I really admire Laurell K Hamilton's ability to go so deep into a character and deal with changes that are so dramatic to the fundamental beliefs of a character.  To me, this is such an insanely interesting part of what you can do as a writer/ reader of paranomal is delve into the human psyche in an even deeper way that you can with regular fiction. 

 

I had to crack up at an earlier posters comment though that it isn't the sex scenes that bother them, but the lead up adn the endless discussions about what everyone likes...I was rolling.  I have to admit to skimming some of that too!

 

All that being said, I would be incredibly thrilled if somehow one of the future books is an enormously long mystery focused one rather mostly relationship development. That aspect of Hit List made me happy (except for the length part).  In the end, I hope LKH continues to write what she wants to write though--trying to write a certain way just to please fans doesn't work.

 

Lineola