- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Email to a Friend
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
I’m probably a mystery writer because my mother was a bookkeeper and my father was an engineer.
They were both logical people with logical professions. For every debit, the bookkeeper records a credit. For every action, the engineer expects an equal reaction. Their work is governed by logical rules.
The mathematical gene needed for these professions skipped me entirely, but the habit of looking for logic was engrained along with my Pablum.
Plus, I was born loving to daydream.
Result: A writer who values storytelling above philosophy and who wants the story to come out “right.”
To me “right” doesn’t mean “happily.” It means “logically.” Or “satisfactorily.” The bad should be punished, and the good, if not rewarded, allowed to rebuild their lives.
Gee! I just described one of the qualities of a traditional mystery.
The mystery novel – like all fiction – may have little to do with reflecting real life. Life isn’t always logical. Inexplicable things happen. Too often the bad get away with it, and the good are left to suffer.
Not in my books. Not in the ones I like to read and definitely not in the ones I write. In my books the villain is ultimately uncovered, and his motives are revealed. All the clues are explained, all the sub-plots tied up.
This does not mean that mysteries don’t have broad themes. After all, mysteries are about good vs. evil in its purest form. But to the fan of the traditional mystery, it all has to make sense.
But wait – every time Jessica Fletcher goes out to dinner, she falls over a body. How can that make sense? If it happened to a real-life person, all her friends would drop her, and the police would keep a very close eye on her.
In the small town in Michigan where my husband’s family has always vacationed, there have been three killings in the past ten years. Yet my protagonist, Lee McKinney Woodyard, lives in a similar town and has solved a dozen murders in less than five fictional years. Have my readers rebelled?
No. They seem to like it.
It’s all part of literary tradition. A western novel needs cattle rustlers. What would a science fiction novel be without an alien, or a romance novel without a sexy hero?
That’s the other thing I like about traditional mysteries – they have rules to follow. As a reader I know that the mystery I read will have a crime, a criminal, a detective.
Does this make mysteries a dull literary form? Absolutely not.
Within that framework there are millions of variations. The crime may be a murder – or the theft of a church tract. The criminal can be a child or an old woman. And so can the detective. The background of the story may be a Neanderthal tribe, a modern city, a medieval monastery, a space station five centuries in the future.
It can even be a chocolate company in a West Michigan resort town.
Do you like your mysteries tied up cleanly?
Editor's Note: JoAnna Carl is the author of the Chocoholic series. Kirkus Reviews said that the recently released Chocolate Cupid Killings "has enough mystery and chocolate trivia to keep fans happily turning pages while munching on bonbons (not supplied)."
- Mark as Read
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
I like mysteries that leave you like shocked because you never expect the ending or mysteries that actually show you the answer through the whole book but you are so entertained you never actually deduce that is the answer. It is really awesome when you never expect the ending and you stay like traumatized because you never expect what is going to happen, for me that is a good mystery.
- Mark as Read
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
I love twist endings, as long as they make sense. I grew reading Twilight Zone and Alfred Hitchcock anthologies, and red herring-filled mysteries. I like to be surprised, but it drives me nuts if there are no clues to support the denouemont.
- Mark as Read
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
I love surprises and shocks, but in the end I need it to make sense and any loose ties neatly sewn up. That way it leaves me complete, and happy that I spent the time reading the book.
- Mark as Read
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
If the clue were there, great, excellent. But those out of the blue no clues revalation endings are things that cause me stop reading books by that author. It's one thing to not put the pieces togeather, it's one to figure it out before the protagonist, but not being able to see the process of the revalation at all; just makes me feel cheated.
You must be a registered user to add a comment here. If you've already registered, please log in. If you haven't registered yet, please register and log in.
