Since 1997, you’ve been coming to BarnesandNoble.com to discuss everything from Stephen King to writing to Harry Potter. You’ve made our site more than a place to discover your next book: you’ve made it a community. But like all things internet, BN.com is growing and changing. We've said goodbye to our community message boards—but that doesn’t mean we won’t still be a place for adventurous readers to connect and discover.

Now, you can explore the most exciting new titles (and remember the classics) at the Barnes & Noble Book Blog. Check out conversations with authors like Jeff VanderMeer and Gary Shteyngart at the B&N Review, and browse write-ups of the best in literary fiction. Come to our Facebook page to weigh in on what it means to be a book nerd. Browse digital deals on the NOOK blog, tweet about books with us,or self-publish your latest novella with NOOK Press. And for those of you looking for support for your NOOK, the NOOK Support Forums will still be here.

We will continue to provide you with books that make you turn pages well past midnight, discover new worlds, and reunite with old friends. And we hope that you’ll continue to tell us how you’re doing, what you’re reading, and what books mean to you.

Reply
Author
ConnieAnnKirk
Posts: 5,472
Registered: ‎06-14-2007
0 Kudos

Fate

Here's another question from the B&N classics edition, p. 315:
 
"'In no other book does [Hardy] urge more unmistakably his belief that men and women are but helpless puppets in the hands of a mischievous fate,' writes Joyce Kilmer.  Do you agree?  Is this 'fate' imposed upon a character, or does it originate from within?  In other words, is fate's operative agency human or supernatural?"
 
What do you think?
 
~ConnieK
 
~ConnieAnnKirk




[CAK's books , website.]
Distinguished Wordsmith
Everyman
Posts: 9,216
Registered: ‎10-19-2006
0 Kudos

Re: Fate

I would have put Tess ahead of Casterbridge in Hardy's presentation of the implacability of fate in human affairs.

ConnieK wrote:
Here's another question from the B&N classics edition, p. 315:
 
"'In no other book does [Hardy] urge more unmistakably his belief that men and women are but helpless puppets in the hands of a mischievous fate,' writes Joyce Kilmer.  Do you agree?  Is this 'fate' imposed upon a character, or does it originate from within?  In other words, is fate's operative agency human or supernatural?"
 
What do you think?
 
~ConnieK
 



_______________
I think, therefore I drive people nuts.
Users Online
Currently online: 44 members 771 guests
Please welcome our newest community members: