- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Mark Thread as New
- Mark Thread as Read
- Float this Thread to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
06-27-2008 04:39 PM
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
06-30-2008 10:05 AM
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1
[ Edited ]- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
06-30-2008 04:26 PM - edited 06-30-2008 04:27 PM
I think most children in those situations would either become withdrawn or fearful or just scream all the time. But though she is "disagreeable" she is intelligent and highly adaptable. Often, even if abandoned by parents, a child seems to crave them or something like them. It seems inborn.
This situation reminded me a bit of an experiment done with monkeys sometime ago. Mammals, and especially primates, need some sort of warm contact, some sort of love. It is inherent in their nature. But Mary has none but yet she managed to insulate herself without total emotional withdrawal. I wonder how any of us would have fared under similar circumstances. Would we have her spunk to deal with the world as much on her terms as she did. As socially "disagreeable" as her behavior is, it is very adaptive. she has survived emotionally pretty well and I admire her.
The experiments I am referring to are those carried out by Harry Harlow. We need something cuddly to hold on to even if it is a "Teddy Bear".
Harry Harlow's Surrogate Mother experiments:
http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~adoption/studies/Harl
Mary is a survivor and I think she will fare very well.
Message Edited by niki on 06-30-2008 03:27 PM
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1
[ Edited ]- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-01-2008 11:07 AM - edited 07-02-2008 03:14 PM
Message Edited by ConnieK on 07-02-2008 03:14 PM
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-01-2008 07:14 PM
On a better note, anyone who likes The Secret Garden should try to get their hands on Julie Andrew's (yes, the actress)book, Mandy. It's a more updated version and wonderful. I immediately bought it in hardback after reading it years ago (after reading the Secret Garden). It may be out of print now, however; I never see it or hear anyone else referring to it.
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-01-2008 08:13 PM
The book you mentioned is still available and looks delightful! She wrote it under the name Julie Andrews Edwards. There is an excerpt from it at:
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Mandy/Julie-Andre
Deetokitty wrote:
Forgive me for writing a downer, but regarding Niki's reference to the Harlow monkey experiments--this was a horrific time in psychology, when "experimenters" were allowed to abuse these tiny baby animals, poor little human-like primates to "prove" that children who do not have mothers, or are rejected by their mothers suffer incredibly. Do you really need to torture an animal to know this? We see it all the time in the real world of people. I am still amazed that I, a psych. major, was not horrified when I first learned about these experiments 40 years ago, I pray they are not still using them as examples of good psychology.
On a better note, anyone who likes The Secret Garden should try to get their hands on Julie Andrew's (yes, the actress)book, Mandy. It's a more updated version and wonderful. I immediately bought it in hardback after reading it years ago (after reading the Secret Garden). It may be out of print now, however; I never see it or hear anyone else referring to it.
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-02-2008 03:16 PM
Deetokitty wrote:
Forgive me for writing a downer, but regarding Niki's reference to the Harlow monkey experiments--this was a horrific time in psychology, when "experimenters" were allowed to abuse these tiny baby animals, poor little human-like primates to "prove" that children who do not have mothers, or are rejected by their mothers suffer incredibly. Do you really need to torture an animal to know this? We see it all the time in the real world of people. I am still amazed that I, a psych. major, was not horrified when I first learned about these experiments 40 years ago, I pray they are not still using them as examples of good psychology.
On a better note, anyone who likes The Secret Garden should try to get their hands on Julie Andrew's (yes, the actress)book, Mandy. It's a more updated version and wonderful. I immediately bought it in hardback after reading it years ago (after reading the Secret Garden). It may be out of print now, however; I never see it or hear anyone else referring to it.
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-02-2008 04:33 PM
But you know, readers. We can't turn back the clocks, now can we? There is always a struggle to find the truth and sometimes the soul gets over looked. We all do alot to learn about things we know little about. Like with the monkey experiments. I think this experiment did beneifit the mentally handicapped population. It helped set up programs to help those poor souls have happier lives because most of them had been hospitalized or instutionalized all their live or part of it. And did not know love the known conventional way. Now of course, since we do know and the experiment helped us know, that showing love is so important that children with mental handicapps are not taken away from their families as before. They are encouraged to stay in the home and services are provided for helping the family cope with this di sability. And also helps develop further knowledge for the handicap. Life is usually a sacrifice for someone. Someone is helped and someone is hurt. Isn't that what the Christian believes.? That Jesus sacrificed his life for him or her. And the same with war. I do not believe in it, but the concept is the same. I am glad they donot use animals in experiments in this way anymore but I am glad I can reason with myself about the time they were sacrifice.d. They helped others have a better life and change life for others which is so surreal.
ConnieK wrote:Thanks, Deetokitty. I actually didn't go to the monkey links (sorry, niki). I agree that experimenters' lack of awareness of their cruelty toward animals back then mirrors Mary's mother and father to her in the book.~ConnieK
Deetokitty wrote:
Forgive me for writing a downer, but regarding Niki's reference to the Harlow monkey experiments--this was a horrific time in psychology, when "experimenters" were allowed to abuse these tiny baby animals, poor little human-like primates to "prove" that children who do not have mothers, or are rejected by their mothers suffer incredibly. Do you really need to torture an animal to know this? We see it all the time in the real world of people. I am still amazed that I, a psych. major, was not horrified when I first learned about these experiments 40 years ago, I pray they are not still using them as examples of good psychology.
On a better note, anyone who likes The Secret Garden should try to get their hands on Julie Andrew's (yes, the actress)book, Mandy. It's a more updated version and wonderful. I immediately bought it in hardback after reading it years ago (after reading the Secret Garden). It may be out of print now, however; I never see it or hear anyone else referring to it.
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 2
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-02-2008 05:12 PM
"She had begun to wonder why she had never seemed to belong to anyone even when her father and mother had been alive....she did not know she was disagreeable. She often thought that other people were, but she did not know that she was so herself."
Maybe ignorance is bliss and why she managed to come out of this relatively well adjusted.
She is moving into a similar situations where her uncle is a gloomy and isolated person who doesn't want to be bothered with her either. And Mrs. Medlock doesn't seem to be a candidate for a loving substitute mother. Still, Mary doesn't seem that concerned "'It doesn't matter,' said Mary, 'whether I care or not.'" I am finding Mary's adaptability amazing!
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-02-2008 09:56 PM
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-02-2008 10:53 PM
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-03-2008 10:55 AM
Bayles wrote:I must confess, I don't currently have a copy of the book. However, I have read it many times.It is interesting that Mary is the direct opposite of the the Little Princess. Which do you think you are going to like best?
You can refresh your memory online:
http://etext.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/BurSec
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-03-2008 01:57 PM
Go to here to check out those links. Particularly interesting to me were some of these Utube videos of Yorkshire scenery and villages. This is perhaps much like the landscape that Mary came to know.
I think, therefore I drive people nuts.
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-03-2008 02:08 PM
I'm not seeing that quite this early in the book. It's true that as in Jane Eyre, Mary is an orphan sent to live with not very likable relatives, but orphans were a favorite motif of Victorian literature -- think David Copperfield, Bleak House, Vanity Fair, Oliver Twist, and on and on. Will there more parallels to be seen with JE as our reading progresses?
I think, therefore I drive people nuts.
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-03-2008 02:27 PM
Everyman wrote:
Gretchen Gerzina, in The Annotated Secret Garden contends that "the biggest influences on The Secret Garden were undoubtedly Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte and Wuthering Heights by her sister Emily."
I'm not seeing that quite this early in the book. It's true that as in Jane Eyre, Mary is an orphan sent to live with not very likable relatives, but orphans were a favorite motif of Victorian literature -- think David Copperfield, Bleak House, Vanity Fair, Oliver Twist, and on and on. Will there more parallels to be seen with JE as our reading progresses?
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-03-2008 05:47 PM
Laurel wrote:
I think of Jane Eyre every time I read The Secret Garden. There's the setting, of course, and some of the same words, but the biggest similarity will call out to you when you get to the last part of the book.
Everyman wrote:
Gretchen Gerzina, in The Annotated Secret Garden contends that "the biggest influences on The Secret Garden were undoubtedly Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte and Wuthering Heights by her sister Emily."
I'm not seeing that quite this early in the book. It's true that as in Jane Eyre, Mary is an orphan sent to live with not very likable relatives, but orphans were a favorite motif of Victorian literature -- think David Copperfield, Bleak House, Vanity Fair, Oliver Twist, and on and on. Will there more parallels to be seen with JE as our reading progresses?
I think, therefore I drive people nuts.
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-04-2008 09:08 PM
The last time I read The Secret Garden was probably almost a year ago, but I've read it enough times that I just had to glance at the end of chapter 6 to make sure I don't accidentally post any spoilers.
First, I don't have a very high tolerance for scene description. (If two characters are walking in a forest, that's enough information for me. I don't need the trees, the path, the lighting, the sounds, etc. described to me in minute detail.) I've never put my finger on what exactly it is, but some writers are able to describe a setting in a way that keeps my attention, and Burnett is one of them. I really enjoy her imagery.
I also really like the fairy tale quality of the story. There is something kind of hazy and dreamlike about Mary's life in India, starting with the fact that she is "the child no one ever saw". Mary herself is the first "secret" in the book (more on that later). And then the scene with the empty dining room and the abandoned dinner, Mary drinking that glass of wine, the deep sleep that follows, and how changed her world is when she wakes up...not to mention the snake with its jeweled eyes...I loved how Burnett took a cholera epidemic and made it feel so mysterious.
I just had to delete my last sentence after realizing that it pertained to the entire book, so I better quit before I reveal any themes or something like that. Although I will say that India could have been portrayed better...it wasn't really fair to suggest that Mary was ill because she lived in India, seeming to blame the country rather than her parents. A Little Princess also has a setting in India, but in a much more pleasant light, so perhaps it was unintentional.
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-05-2008 01:56 PM
Bayles wrote:I must confess, I don't currently have a copy of the book. However, I have read it many times.It is interesting that Mary is the direct opposite of the the Little Princess. Which do you think you are going to like best?
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-05-2008 01:58 PM
Everyman wrote:
Gretchen Gerzina, in The Annotated Secret Garden contends that "the biggest influences on The Secret Garden were undoubtedly Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte and Wuthering Heights by her sister Emily."
I'm not seeing that quite this early in the book. It's true that as in Jane Eyre, Mary is an orphan sent to live with not very likable relatives, but orphans were a favorite motif of Victorian literature -- think David Copperfield, Bleak House, Vanity Fair, Oliver Twist, and on and on. Will there more parallels to be seen with JE as our reading progresses?
Re: Chapter by Chapter: 1 - 6 (No Spoilers, Please!)
- Mark Message as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to this message's RSS Feed
- Highlight This Message
- Print This Message
- E-mail this Message to a Friend
- Report Abuse to a Moderator
07-05-2008 09:01 PM
"bookmagic418.blogspot.com