Steve Martin's latest book is An Object of Beauty; his previous was The Pleasure of My Company. That possessive pronoun "my" before a noun looks fine, but if it were before a gerund, would we enjoy it as much? 

 

Copy editor extraordinaire Kristen E. recently noted that she doesn't, always. She doesn't enjoy their appearing at all. Would Kristen enjoy them appearing more? Ah, there's the rub! Their vs. them, before a gerund. Why do grammar books mandate the use of the possessive before the gerund?

 

Think of gerunds, those verbals that end in -ing, as nouns. Think of nouns and how we work with them when they aren't gerunds. Think of Steve Martin. (But please, don't think of juggling kittens, King Tut, Two Wild and Crazy Guys, or The Jerk -- all quite long-ago creations of Steve Martin that have been amusing us for years. This is something else indeed.)

 

 

 

Possessive pronouns appear before nouns. Easy enough.

 

Gerunds are nouns. Despite their verby look, their -ing ending, the way they mimic, nay, are identical to the participles that in fact make up so many English verbs--is eating, was writing, have been amusing--gerunds are not verbs. They are forms of the verb that are nouns.

 

Gerunds are natural: Think of how we say "His running is getting better." "Jane's skiing has improved so much!" "Their accounting leaves a lot to be desired." All these -ing words get modifiers, and possessive pronouns do that job.

 

Where we run into trouble is when a gerund (an -ing noun) and its possessive pronoun come right after a real verb. Think of "He admired her eating." Our eyes follow the sentence, and see that he admired her, and then that he admired her eating. Neither construction is out of the orindary. Her works as the object of the verb admired AND as the modifier of the noun eating. Nice trick, her!

 

But when we have a construction such as "Kristen doesn't enjoy their appearing at all," our language processing centers can jam up. Our eyes move along the sentence and see Kristen doesn't enjoy . . . their? We intuitively expect the object form, them, in that spot right after the verb, not the possessive their, which goes on to modify the gerund appearing.

 

The problem arises when a possessive pronoun is in a tight spot, between a transitive verb that usually takes an object and a noun that needs a possessive. Some pronouns, like the graceful her, can do both; others, like the clumsy his and him, cannot.

 

I conclude, therefore, that feminine pronouns are better at multitasking than masculine ones. I leave any sexist conclusions to you, as well as a recommendation to read Steve Martin. Now.

 

Do you enjoy a possessive pronoun before a gerund? Do you wish the construction would go jump in a lake? Let us know!

 

Ellen Scordato has 25 years' book publishing experience as an editor, copy editor, proofreader, and managing editor. She's now a partner in The Stonesong Press, a nonfiction book producer and agency. In addition to her work at Stonesong, Ellen has taught grammar, punctuation, and style at the New School for more than 12 years in the English Language Studies department and taught English as a Second Language at Cabrini Immigrant Services.

 

0 Kudos
Comments
by Blogger Albert_Rolls on ‎12-23-2010 05:46 AM

“An immediate land reform could easily have led to his [Villa’s] soldiers returning home to secure their lands and refusing to fight outside their communities.”  Isn't it instances like this that cause the problems? Admittedly, "his soldiers" could be replaced with them, assuming the antecedent was in the previous sentence, but "Something could have led to their returning home" is what I would write without hesitation, but I would have to stop, think, and notice to write "have led to his soldiers' returning home," I have even had copy editors remove  the mark of possession when I have done the stopping, thinking, and noticing. I've always wondered if I missed something when that noun/gerund business was teeth-gritted into my head. (There was no pounding stuff into people's heads in my day.)

by Fan4SFGiants on ‎12-23-2010 10:34 PM

Pure Drivel is another one of Steve Martin's best books. I own it on CD and I just LOVE it!

About Unabashedly Bookish: The BN Community Blog
Unabashedly Bookish features new articles every day from the Book Clubs staff, guest authors, and friends on hot topics in the world of books, language, writing, and publishing. From trends in the publishing business to updates on genre fiction fan communities, from fun lessons on grammar to reflections on literature in our personal lives, this blog is the best source for your daily dose of all things bookish.

Advertisement

Since 1997, you’ve been coming to BarnesandNoble.com to discuss everything from Stephen King to writing to Harry Potter. You’ve made our site more than a place to discover your next book: you’ve made it a community. But like all things internet, BN.com is growing and changing. We've said goodbye to our community message boards—but that doesn’t mean we won’t still be a place for adventurous readers to connect and discover.

Now, you can explore the most exciting new titles (and remember the classics) at the Barnes & Noble Book Blog. Check out conversations with authors like Jeff VanderMeer and Gary Shteyngart at the B&N Review, and browse write-ups of the best in literary fiction. Come to our Facebook page to weigh in on what it means to be a book nerd. Browse digital deals on the NOOK blog, tweet about books with us,or self-publish your latest novella with NOOK Press. And for those of you looking for support for your NOOK, the NOOK Support Forums will still be here.

We will continue to provide you with books that make you turn pages well past midnight, discover new worlds, and reunite with old friends. And we hope that you’ll continue to tell us how you’re doing, what you’re reading, and what books mean to you.

Categories