The fantasy genre has been powered by serialized storylines ever since I can remember – Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, Moorcock’s Elric novels, Zelazny’s Chronicles of Amber, Le Guin’s Earthsea, Silverberg's Majipoor, Edgar Rice Burroughs’ John Carter of Mars (categorized as science fiction but replete with fantasy elements), McCaffrey’s Pern, etc.

 

But it seems that over the last decade or so several authors (or publishers, I should say) just don't know when to suitably end a long-running saga – drawing out a series for the sake of more installments, it seems. (I’ve heard it been called “milking it” by a few not-so-politically correct genre fans.) And, sadly, standalone fantasy novels, like Brandon Sanderson’s Elantris  and Pandemonium by Daryl Gregory, are quickly becoming an endangered species…

There are some literally shelf-bending series out there: George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire, Terry Goodkind’s Sword of Truth, Robert Jordan’s unfinished Wheel of Time cycle, Terry Brooks’ Shannara, Laurell K. Hamilton's Anita Blake sequence, Steve Erikson’s Malazan Book of the Fallen, to name just a few…

Sanderson – the author of not only brilliant standalone novels like Elantris and Warbreaker and the Mistborn trilogy but also the writer who is going to finish the late Robert Jordan’s massive Wheel of Time – was a guest on BarnesandNoble.com’s Fantasy/Science Fiction forum recently and this is what he had to say about why more and more fantasy sagas are going looooong.

“When a standalone comes out, it tends to gather praise from both readers and reviewers. Then proceeds to sell far fewer copies than a series book does.  The Wheel of Time didn't hit #1 on the NYT list until book eight or nine, I believe, and I don't think Sword of Truth hit #1 until book ten. Series tend to sell better. Even as readers complain about them. And so I think publishers do push for them. 


But why do they sell better? Well, I think this is partially the learning curve factor. We like fantasy for the same reason that fantasy is hard to read: the learning curve. Starting a fantasy book can be tough because of how many new names, concepts, societies, religions, and laws of physics you have to learn and get used to. Epics, with their dozens upon dozens of characters, are even tougher in this regard. And so, after investing so much energy into becoming an expert in the world, we want to get a good payoff and be able to USE that expertise.
 
Beyond that, I think that fantasy is character driven – and when we fall in love with characters, we want to read more about them. Fantasy, particularly the epic series, allows us to follow characters across sweeping, life changing events. Fantasy… gives us lots of pages and time to know these characters. So we want more from them.  
 
But the very thing that we love about fantasy in this regard also tends to present problems. We want lots of characters, but eventually this large cast overwhelms us and makes the books seem to drag. Personally, I think these complaints will be much lessened when some of these great series are done, and you don't have to wait years and years between volumes.  
 
Anyway, Terry Brooks talks a lot about this in his biographical work Sometimes the Magic Works. (Bet you can find it here on BN.com, and I highly suggest the book as a quick, interesting, engaging read.) He mentions how, when he left Shannara to write other things, the fans begged and begged him for more. Until finally he broke down and gave them more books in the world.  
 
A lot of authors I know tend to live in this state of perpetual wonder and amazement that, finally, people are actually enjoying and reading their works. (After all the years of failure trying to break in, I know that I feel this way a lot.) When someone comes to you and talks about how much they love one of your works, asking you to write more...well, we're storytellers. If people want a story, we want to give it to them. It's hard to say no. (Though so far I have.)
 
I intend to keep writing standalone novels. But I do so knowing that 1) they will not sell as well as series books and, 2) readers will ask me for more, and so each standalone will only increase the number of requests for future books that I can't write. I'm in the fortunate place that I can write, and publish, what I want – whether it be series or standalone – and no longer have to worry about the money.  
 
But, in my heart, I've got a strong desire to write a big epic. I grew up reading them. I want to see if I can do one, my way, and add something new to the genre. So maybe that's the reason. Looking through Robert Jordan's notes, reading interviews, I don't think he ever artificially inflated the length of his series because of publisher desire or money reasons. I think he loved the long-form epic, and wanted to tell the story his way, no matter how long it took. And as he added more characters, it took longer and longer.”

Sanderson obviously knows what he is talking about – and I agree with his comments wholeheartedly. Looooong series probably do sell better and amass substantially more readers. But personally, I love a good standalone fantasy – I don’t have to invest decades waiting for the books to be released and then to eventually read them all to get to some kind of satisfactory conclusion. Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy a good epic fantasy just like the next person but it seems like every new fantasy or paranormal fantasy release that I pick up nowadays is part of a series and it’s starting to discourage me.

Is the standalone fantasy becoming passé? I certainly hope not...

Message Edited by paulgoatallen on 08-03-2009 03:30 PM
Comments
by carmen22 on ‎08-03-2009 09:56 AM
I just love Sanderson's response, especially the part about being a storyteller! I also really enjoy standalone novels and not having to wait forever to get to the conclusion. But I can see why people would want more of the characters they love, and I know I do at times. Once you enter a world of such outstanding characters and magic it's hard to just let go. Sometimes it seems you just can't help yourself but to Want More!  
by on ‎08-03-2009 11:24 AM
I to agree with Brandon and enjoy standalones but I'm like Krista I also enjoy series.  A lot of it depends on how much time I have to invest in reading.  But I also enjoy Anthologies because it is much easier to put them down after reading a story and get back to work.
by on ‎08-03-2009 12:31 PM

I am very picky on the series I start reading.

There are some great series out there.

But I hate waiting for the next book, which for some series are very far apart. And there are 2 reasons I have to admit I have quit reading some series. The first is waiting too long for the next book to come out. The second is the series was too long for me based on loss of interest in the characters/story or it was just time to wrap it up and do the last book.

A standalone book develops characters, develops a storyline, describes the settings/environments, etc. all in one book. True a standalone book doesn't invest as much time and I very rarely quit reading a book because I like to give the book a chance. Yes I have quit reading standalone based on loss of interest in characters/story, too.

I will still try to give both series and standalone a shot. But I remain a picky reader in choosing the first book in a series.

by on ‎08-03-2009 07:48 PM

(shrug)

 

Ocationally I'll run across a good stand alone, but truthfully I find them a rareity.  Authors seldom put enough effort into one. A good sci/fi, ect... has a great deal of world building behind it. The more carefully constructed worlds rarely exist in a stand alone. Which is why I don't mind a series (even those written 10 years apart). Any author worth my time puts that nessisary world building effort into a series.  In this instance quality breeds quantity.  

by on ‎08-04-2009 11:30 AM

I do love a good stand alone also.  But short of repeating Krista and Toni, I too can get into a series - once you get to know the world you feel comfortable with it along with the rules that apply and want to see where they go next.

 

I am one who likes short series, like a trilogy.  I can watch the world grow and end, not feeling that I was short of any information given.  Sometimes in a stand alone book I feel there is information skipped over to fit the book into a book.  The shorter series are nice for me and then I don't feel as I am waiting a decade for the story to end.

 

Melissa

by Sensitivemuse on ‎08-05-2009 02:39 PM

It was funny, I picked up Elantris and finished it, loved it and then thought to myself; "Isn't there going to be a series about this? I want to know what happens next" I think we're so used to have so many fantasy series out there that when a stand alone comes out you're left wanting for more. Also take for example The Final Empire trilogy, there's still several things left loose! I am craving for more! :smileytongue: Sanderson could have easily expanded that into maybe another two more books or so. 

 

However, you then have series that are longer, The Gentlemen Bastards isn't that supposed to be a 7 book series? I finished reading the second one and thought why the hell is this going to be 7 books? the second one stunk! it dragged forever!

 

I guess some series out there deserve to be long, but some you wonder.. why??? :smileyhappy:

About Unabashedly Bookish: The BN Community Blog
Unabashedly Bookish features new articles every day from the Book Clubs staff, guest authors, and friends on hot topics in the world of books, language, writing, and publishing. From trends in the publishing business to updates on genre fiction fan communities, from fun lessons on grammar to reflections on literature in our personal lives, this blog is the best source for your daily dose of all things bookish.

Advertisement

Since 1997, you’ve been coming to BarnesandNoble.com to discuss everything from Stephen King to writing to Harry Potter. You’ve made our site more than a place to discover your next book: you’ve made it a community. But like all things internet, BN.com is growing and changing. We've said goodbye to our community message boards—but that doesn’t mean we won’t still be a place for adventurous readers to connect and discover.

Now, you can explore the most exciting new titles (and remember the classics) at the Barnes & Noble Book Blog. Check out conversations with authors like Jeff VanderMeer and Gary Shteyngart at the B&N Review, and browse write-ups of the best in literary fiction. Come to our Facebook page to weigh in on what it means to be a book nerd. Browse digital deals on the NOOK blog, tweet about books with us,or self-publish your latest novella with NOOK Press. And for those of you looking for support for your NOOK, the NOOK Support Forums will still be here.

We will continue to provide you with books that make you turn pages well past midnight, discover new worlds, and reunite with old friends. And we hope that you’ll continue to tell us how you’re doing, what you’re reading, and what books mean to you.

Categories