The apostrophe: A tiny mark, not even a punctuation mark, syntactically, but it has its uses. And its misuses! And those misuses can create some true howlers on the page. In the popular 

Eats, Shoots & Leaves Lynne Truss talks about the "greengrocer's apostrophe," the wildly inappropriate use of this mark, plus the letter "s," to create plurals on (usually) handwritten signs on fruits, vegetables, flowers, and so on. That use of the apostrohe stems from a misunderstanding of plural and possessive -- but there are other misunderstandings as well.


Let's take a look at this rather underappreciated mark. When a good friend had his work reviewed by a creative writing professor, the professor started off by saying, "There are two words you have a problem with and you must learn the difference between them!" Another friend, an accomplished, award-winning playwright, makes this mistake in every script. What two words? What mistake? It's the mistake about "its"


Apostrophes have two main uses: to take the place of a missing letter in a contraction and to form the possessive form of nouns, and that is the key.


Most of the time, using the apostrophe as a replacement letter is very straightforward. In the "n't" contraction, the apostrophe clearly takes the place of the letter O. Can't, isn't, didn't, doesn't; none of these present much of a problem. Occasionally, people can be confused by constructions such as rhythm n blues and rock n roll, but a quick look in your dictionary of choice will solve that. I prefer rock 'n' roll and rhythm 'n' blues, in which the two apostrophes clearly take the place of the missing "a" and "d" in the conjunction "and," but if another dictionary says otherwise, and you are faithfully following that authority, so be it.


Thus, in "it's," the apostrophe takes the place of the missing "i" in "is." Straightforward, eh?


Not exactly. The pronoun "it" has a possessive form. Just like the proper noun "Oprah" does. And when Oprah has a few miliion dollars, those are Oprah's millions. The apostrophe/s combo indicates possession. And when "it" has a few million dollars, those are . . . its millions. See the trouble? People form the possessive case of nouns with apostrophe/s, and sometimes they form the possessive of the pronoun "it" that way, too.


But pronouns change form, or spelling to indicate possesion rather than adding apostrophe/s: Think of she and her, he and his, they and their, it and its. "It" plus apostrophe/s equals "it is" not "belonging to it."


The easiest way I know to avoid this common mistake is to always think, "Can I write 'it is' instead?" if you can, apostrophe! if not, none. And whatever you do, do NOT rely on spell check. Spell check cannot tell the difference. It's stilll possible for our brain to get some exercise on its own.

Message Edited by Jon_B on 05-20-2009 01:14 PM
by Jon_B on ‎05-20-2009 03:21 PM
Great article, Ellen.  Personally I've always thought it was interesting how the apostrophe is used in Sci-Fi and Fantasy books as a means of making names of characters and places seem especially alien.  I've always felt that this kind of usage in these genres felt a bit arbitrary, not really in line with the way the symbol is used in English because it's certainly not indicating possession and doesn't seem to be a substitute for a missing letter either - though I could be wrong on that one.  But it always seemed more that in the context of genre fiction the apostrophe is used either as a syllable marker or simply as a symbol inserted into proper nouns to make them look wierd.
by on ‎05-21-2009 08:22 AM
As in Teal'c from Stargate?  I don't know of any language on this planet which puts an apostrophe in front of a "c", so that comes across as alien to me, just as the writers intended.
by Blogger Ellen_Scordato on ‎05-21-2009 03:42 PM

Jon, that is a really good point. As an old sci-fi and fantasy fan from way back, I know EXACTLY what you mean. 


I think those writers are using the apostrophe as a diacritical mark rather than a punctuation mark, like the diacritical mark called the 'okina, seen in Hawai'ian, Hawai'i, etc.


In that case, the diacritical is described by Univ of Hawaii as a "single open quote" rather than an apostrophe for some reason, but the shape is the same, as far as I can see. Very interesting. . . .

About Unabashedly Bookish: The BN Community Blog
Unabashedly Bookish features new articles every day from the Book Clubs staff, guest authors, and friends on hot topics in the world of books, language, writing, and publishing. From trends in the publishing business to updates on genre fiction fan communities, from fun lessons on grammar to reflections on literature in our personal lives, this blog is the best source for your daily dose of all things bookish.


Since 1997, you’ve been coming to to discuss everything from Stephen King to writing to Harry Potter. You’ve made our site more than a place to discover your next book: you’ve made it a community. But like all things internet, is growing and changing. We've said goodbye to our community message boards—but that doesn’t mean we won’t still be a place for adventurous readers to connect and discover.

Now, you can explore the most exciting new titles (and remember the classics) at the Barnes & Noble Book Blog. Check out conversations with authors like Jeff VanderMeer and Gary Shteyngart at the B&N Review, and browse write-ups of the best in literary fiction. Come to our Facebook page to weigh in on what it means to be a book nerd. Browse digital deals on the NOOK blog, tweet about books with us,or self-publish your latest novella with NOOK Press. And for those of you looking for support for your NOOK, the NOOK Support Forums will still be here.

We will continue to provide you with books that make you turn pages well past midnight, discover new worlds, and reunite with old friends. And we hope that you’ll continue to tell us how you’re doing, what you’re reading, and what books mean to you.