'Lot 49' and 9/12

Categories: historical fiction

Like many members of this website, I didn't even think twice about bringing books with me on a short vacation. But when people asked me what I did in New Orleans and I said, "I read The Crying of Lot 49," that got a couple raised eyebrows. Even though I am by no means a teetotaler who would ignore what New Orleans had to offer, it's not as if most people consider Thomas Pynchon party-vacation reading.


I'm glad I'd taken the time to re-read the book, because it made me feel better this Saturday when going through programs I'd TiVo'd of the 9/12 Teaparty protests. This probably seems like a nebulous association, so bear with me.


Lot 49 describes the struggle of one Oedipa Maas to understand why her recently deceased ex-boyfriend, tycoon Pierce Inverarity, named her executrix of his estate. That he'd ask this of her is bizarre, almost like a prank from beyond the grave. But instead of finding answers to his last requests, she instead finds a conspiracy called the Trystero, identified by the signs of muted trumpets drawn in bathrooms, on the streets of San Francisco and on rare historic stamps. The conspiracy may relate to the founding of the United States Postal Service and the destruction of a monopoly mail system that served the Holy Roman Empire, the Thurn and Taxis, and was dissolved in 1867. (The Thurn and Taxis was also real.) It's never certain if this conspiracy is merely Inverarity's invention — a wealthy man paying scholars and graffiti artists to elaborate from one fact (the Thurn and Taxis) to create a giant practical joke on an ex. Inverarity might well be doing with fact and fiction what Pynchon does as an author.



Pynchon's command of conspiracist facts never approaches the breadth or comprehension of something like Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum (which I reviewed here); nor does he employ myths to deconstruct communication and how it shapes reality in a way comparable with Eco's approach. But what becomes evident is a kind of doomed cycle of silence, miscommunication and non-communication, be it a silence via government program or the ineluctable boundaries between human beings never truly capable of understanding one another.


The conspiracy moves inward to personal levels of interaction and outward to encompass both "The Left" and "The Right" on a macro level: those who distrust the "government" mail system include John Bircherites and acid-heads. Pynchon writes, in one of many beautiful passages toward the end of the book:


they'll call it paranoia. They. Either you have stumbled indeed, without the aid of LSD or other indole alkaloids, onto a secret richness and concealed destiny of dream; onto a network by which X number of Americans are truly communicating whilst reserving their lies, recitations of routine, arid betrayals of spiritual poverty, for the official government delivery system; maybe even onto a real alternative to the exitless, to the absence of surprise to life, that harrows the head of everybody American you know. (p. 170)


As fellow blogger Albert Rolls can tell you, Pynchon's had a career-long focus on paranoia and America. For instance, like Lot 49, his latest book, Inherent Vice, seems to be a comic and pop-culture romp that at times arrestingly breaks into elegiac passages on the indefatigable disconnect of America, the institutional quality of ideas and comities missed, culture fragmented into what might be called commodified gangs.


Those passages are what make Pynchon so rewarding as a writer, because they are usually at once mournful to the point of heartbreak while they're also set in the middle of longer prose passages that are almost absurdly hysterical. I confess that, like a lot of people, I read Pynchon when I was younger and very eager to be seen doing things like "Reading Pynchon at My Age" and didn't understand it at all because I was taking something very seriously that often isn't.


Put simply, Pynchon is funny. Whole passages of his longer books read like a man who thought up a brilliantly comic one liner or slapstick mise en scène and thought, "I'm going to fit this somewhere. I don't care how long it takes to work around to this punchline." Take, for example, this scene where Oedipa Maas goes to meet her attorney, Roseman:


But Roseman had also spent a sleepless night, brooding over the Perry Mason television program the evening before, which his wife was fond of but toward which Roseman cherished a fierce ambivalence, wanting at once to be a successful trial lawyer like Perry Mason and, since this was impossible, to destroy Perry Mason by undermining him. (p. 18)


It not only neatly describes the joyless seriousness with which some people import fictional TV programs into their real life, but it's absolutely memorably silly. Get a load of this guy: this guy wants to destroy Perry Mason. More importantly, to him the barrier between his legal profession and the fictional one isn't strong enough anymore to preclude his writing an angry dissertation on the show. Law is real and unreal.


I realize it's not a profound epiphany, but thinking back on the book while seeing so many people so angry this Saturday made me feel better. You'd think the histories I'd read about populist anger would have brought the lesson home sooner, but really it came from this wonderfully bizarre fiction piece. I certainly have no interest in dismissing a political movement, but looking at some people carrying signs about real government programs and others carrying angry ones about stuff that doesn't really exist made me think, "People will always be frightened about national myth, identity and messaging like this."


Perhaps Lot 49's publication date, 1965, has something to do with it. Forty-four years before, and the players are still there: the far left, the far right, facts, fear and, above all, a disruption of communication so profound that those on both sides are willing to apply mysterious agency to it. Just as we now sit in endless identical bedroom communities, indistinguishable on the map, each one a collection of privatized citadels almost irretrievably apart, there is Pynchon's newly invented community of San Narciso, a post-war boomtown contrived from nothing by Inverarity into a still-fantasized exurban wasteland of undifferentiated prosperity:


San Narciso had no boundaries. No one knew yet how to draw them. She had dedicated herself, weeks ago, to making sense of what Inverarity had left behind, never suspecting that the legacy was America. (p. 178)
by Blogger Albert_Rolls on ‎09-18-2009 12:33 PM

Of course Pynchon goes on vacation. The Eco and Pynchon comparison is interesting; add more laurels than I'm allowed to dole out..

by Blogger L_Monty on ‎09-20-2009 04:30 AM

Thanks for the good words, Al! Now, as for going on vacation, I'm a lazy man. Most of the time, I'll pack my Hiaasen with me. I'm not a dedicated reader when I expect to be beached and lazed and sunglazed and worrying more about whether I'm hydrated enough. Let the word go forth from this time and place that I expect a refreshed glass and a glassy refreshment about the eyes. Into that world, Pynchon may intrude, but the mind probably lacks the intensity for any pinchin' on an idea. Better to unfurl the brain across violence and one-liners, without all the polyphony.

About Unabashedly Bookish: The BN Community Blog
Unabashedly Bookish features new articles every day from the Book Clubs staff, guest authors, and friends on hot topics in the world of books, language, writing, and publishing. From trends in the publishing business to updates on genre fiction fan communities, from fun lessons on grammar to reflections on literature in our personal lives, this blog is the best source for your daily dose of all things bookish.


Since 1997, you’ve been coming to BarnesandNoble.com to discuss everything from Stephen King to writing to Harry Potter. You’ve made our site more than a place to discover your next book: you’ve made it a community. But like all things internet, BN.com is growing and changing. We've said goodbye to our community message boards—but that doesn’t mean we won’t still be a place for adventurous readers to connect and discover.

Now, you can explore the most exciting new titles (and remember the classics) at the Barnes & Noble Book Blog. Check out conversations with authors like Jeff VanderMeer and Gary Shteyngart at the B&N Review, and browse write-ups of the best in literary fiction. Come to our Facebook page to weigh in on what it means to be a book nerd. Browse digital deals on the NOOK blog, tweet about books with us,or self-publish your latest novella with NOOK Press. And for those of you looking for support for your NOOK, the NOOK Support Forums will still be here.

We will continue to provide you with books that make you turn pages well past midnight, discover new worlds, and reunite with old friends. And we hope that you’ll continue to tell us how you’re doing, what you’re reading, and what books mean to you.