For the past few years, I've had a wicked-cool job writing about romance fiction for major Internet media outlets.  The best parts of my gig are gathering communities of romance readers and giving them places to dish romance where the "outside world" doesn't diss them about their reading choices.

 

Yet a few years ago, as a former lit snob new to romance reading, I couldn't recite my academic resume quickly enough when friends and colleagues learned I read romance, the books that make up the largest chunk of fiction sold. And when folks made comments about the "cheesy writing" in romance novels, I immediately spouted the list of romance authors educated at Ivy League schools.

In retrospect, it was as if the fully converted-yet-still-embarrassed-to-be-diggin'-happily-ever-afters-and-really-hot-sex-on-the-page me was saying books only have merit if some of a genre's authors went to Good Schools.  I was sending the message that the rest of the "lesser" pool of romance authors somehow were raised up by the Ivies bunch.

 

Thankfully, I've had a few years to clarify and disseminate my opinion that many of the most engaging, successful storytelling talents in romance fiction develop accessible language that communicates - and resonates - more effectively with readers than that of some erudite writers whose regard for technique sometimes results in passion squelched. 

Those of us who've studied lovingly and obsessively any subject know that devotion to erudition has a way of sucking the fun out of just about anything. Romance fiction's no different, except when we're talking the scholarly study of the genre, which has experienced a glorious renaissance in the past few years, led by folks who actually love the books and study them with no second wave axes to grind as used to be the case.

 

You see, scholarly study of romance back in the day sometimes kicked stereotypical Midwestern romance-readin'-haus-frau arse and took names later.  For instance, researcher Janice Radway in her 1984 book, "Reading the Romance," suggested -- thankyouverymuch, my sister -- that feminists could save the day for romance readers by helping them "come to understand their need for romances is a function of their dependent status as women" in patriarchal society. 

 

As if those "dependent" women were different from me and millions of other feminist romance readers today.  We're simply chicks who can and do "do it all" and want to escape at the end of the day with books that let us fantasize about either being stronger or less dominant with the partner/s of our choice who give us the kinds of commitment and emotion-packed sexual fulfillment no one in real life possibly can -- at the same time our fictional saviors pay off our credit cards and invite us to live as forever lovers in the luxury of a desert sheikhdom.

Like us, scholars studying romance fiction today  - especially many feminists who now believe romances empower women -- tend to come at their research from a starting point of respect and admiration for the genre.  In fact, this week Princeton University hosts the United States' first conference on romance scholarship, "Love as a Practice of Freedom? Romance Fiction and American Culture." Romance scholars from around the world will meet to "examine the ways in which romance fiction "resists, rather than perpetuates the assumption that it's sexist and racist."  The conference also "seeks to liberate romance scholarship from some of the critical bonds from its past."

 

I'll be presenting on the closing panel, "Romance Reads the Academy," talking about the ways the reader - especially online - has enlivened today's romance scholarship.  And, yeah, I'll probably suggest the academy study lots of authors who didn't go to, or don't teach at, the Big Schools.

But I'm wondering what you think:  Does better writing make for the best genre fiction novels?  Or does highly technical writing suck the passion out of a good romance?  And, what do you think about scholars taking a look at romance books "as if the novels matter?"

Comments
by Moderator becke_davis on 04-24-2009 11:14 PM
Hi Michelle - what fun to see you here!  You also know me as Treethyme.
by Blogger Michelle_Buonfiglio on 04-25-2009 02:37 AM
Hi, beckeThanks for the welcome, and for traveling all the way over here from the B&N.com boardsYou know, I just got back to my hotel room after the close of the Princeton Romance Scholarship Conference, and I can tell you how invigorating and exciting it was to see this huge gathering of romance scholars and readers, as well as Princeton students learning about romance.   Genre fiction history was made; I kid you not. It was a privilege to listen to the good news, as it were, and hear the amazing 'takes' on and explorations of romance fictionEspecially invigorating was the scholarship on African American/Black romance fiction, because there are so many great romances written about Black folks by Black folks (as well as inter-racial romances written by folks of many ethnicities) that just don't get play and certainly not the play they deserveWe'll remedy that here, of course, to the best of our abilities. :smileyhappy:
by Author PortiaDaCosta on 04-25-2009 04:11 AM

How great to see you here, Michelle! Looking forward to great chat here as well as at Romance Buy the Blog.

 

I think good writing serves the romance novel very well, and by that I mean prose that's so good you don't notice it's 'good writing', if you know what I mean. Writing that's unselfconsciously wonderful and just sweeps you along, rather than being obviously 'literary' and showy for the sake of it. 

 

As you know, I'm reading Sherry Thomas's amazing 'Private Arrangements' at the moment, and it's an example of very fine writing indeed... but it's also so natural and smooth and appealing that it's beautifully easy to read, rather than coming across as braintaxingly literary.

 

As for the scholars... well, romance authors strive for excellence just like writers in any genre, and for that reason, their novels deserve to 'matter'.

by on 04-25-2009 03:35 PM

Hi, Michelle,

I do love a good romance, but I'm not sure how to classify this genre as to what is good, and what isn't good.  I only know from good writing, or at least how that writing is going to translate that romance to me. 

 

There are writers, and there are writers, and I don't particularly care to have a romance thrown in my face, where my face is burried so deeply into those places, it starts to obscure the real reason behind that romance.  If that makes any sense?  Yes, I do like to think when I read, that's just me, and I do like to work through the plot, if there is one, to a romance story. 

 

Romance is in a lot of books I read, but I don't think these books are classified as RN.  How do you define the differences?

 

Kathy

by Blogger Michelle_Buonfiglio on 04-25-2009 05:54 PM

Hi, Kathy!  Thanks for sharing your really thoughtful comment.  Lots of romance novels can be read on several levels, especially the ones that I admire most as a student of literature, the ones that combine mad technical skills -- the latter writers you describe -- and stand-out storytelling. Their romances work as brain- and libido-candy reads, the kind one sinks into for the pure joy of the happily ever after (HEA) fix.

 

Yet w/in those same romances one also can find themes and connections, hints at what might have been going on in/around the author's life while writing it, references to literature, pop culture, film, other romances, philosophy, Shakespeare, graphic novels, psychology, feminism etc., etc., etc.  There's gold in them thar pages to be mined, chewed on, as it were,  to the nerdgirl's delight.  It's very cool that in romance we find books we can think about in the same way we do lit with the proverbial capital L. It's a little like my husband says about Hemingway: You can read him fast, or you can read him slow.

 

I think I understand what you mean about not wanting the romance thrown in your face, which leads me to believe you may like books that have romantic "elements," books that aren't solely about the hero and heroine (or male/female protagonists in non-romance) meeting/splitting/hooking back up for their HEA or, as romance author and essayist Jennifer Cruisie calls it, optimistic ending. Between that, there'll be lots of sensual tension and 'problems,' even if the sensuality level of the book is low or nill.  If I didn't get the gist of your'in your face' comment, let meknow.

 

Finally, while I define romance fiction as a novel w/ a plot (and they all have plots, just some sketchier than others, like all fiction, unfortunately) in which the love story is central. There may be a mystery or task the h/hn (hero/heroine) are trying to perform, but for me, I want to be compelled only by this throughout: How's the author gonna tear em apart, and how's she gonna hook em up in the end.  If I care more about whodunnit than I do about whentheygunnadoit? It ain't a romance.

 

But here's where it gets to be a sticky wicket.  Sometimes the HEA doesn't happen in just one book.  Maybe the heroine is single in series and dates several guys til she finds Prince Charmin' and scores her HEA/OE.  Since I'm stubborn, I want one HEA per book, so I wanna say the 'spillover series' becomes something else.  What? A long-arsed romance?  Writer writer Colleen Gleason, whose Gardella Chronicles are must reads -- Some call em Buffy in an Empire Waistline -- are spillovers that folks are wild for.  Colleen and I have a well-natured disagreement over this each time we chat.

 

I think it's cool you keep finding books that fulfill your need for assessing what you're reading at the same time your filling emotional needs in ways that are positive for you, in this case with romantic elements.  As I continue to post here on Tuesdays, I'd love for you to tell us about the books you do love, because lots of folks who are 'romance' readers, read books that aren't strictly romance, but have romantic elements.

 

yikers. did i just write another blog post, or what? 

by on 04-25-2009 08:42 PM

Yup, you just wrote another blog post!  I tend to do that to people with an active mind!  :smileyvery-happy:  But it's great,  I love your answer, thank you!  And Yes, you hit the proverbial nail! 

 

We're in a discussion, right now, on the Fiction board.  It's Adriana Trigiani's, Very Valentine.  These are the romances I find on the fense, as it were.....and like...  It's both light, and funny, deep and thought provoking, and romance is all in the mix.  It's the first in a series of three books.  Not everything I read has to have a perfect ending, because that's life..... but at the end of the third book, it'd better darn well have the guy of my dreams there with Valentine! Ha!  Adriana is a first for me, and now I have to read the next two to find out what happens to this family!  I love the mystery, but it's going to be hard wait!

 

I will come back, because I do have several favorite authors I read, and I would love to discuss these "romantic elements" with you.

Thanks, again,

Kathy

by Author LLFoster on 04-27-2009 07:20 AM

Hey Michelle!

Great article. You know, I will never understand the need to trash, or so vehemently defend, a form of entertainment. And to me, that's what romances are. We're not setting out to educate the masses, or to change opinions, or influence government. We aim to entertain, and the numbers prove our success!

 

I think on the one hand, folks are threatened by romance fiction.  Not men, but women. Some see the fictional "Happily Ever After" endings as a daunting, and sometimes unattainable goal in reality, and so it's easier to say it doesn't exist than to say that it's something worth the hard work.

 

And I see the writers defending it with a kind of unique umbrage, as if genre fiction hasn't always been under attack. In fact, any form of pure entertainment gets ridiculed by many. Look at how horror, action and comedy flicks are attacked. There are so many fabulous, talented actors who will never be up for an award until they act in a tear jerker or a senseless drama about the cruelty of life - aka - reality.

:::smileyfrustrated:nort:::: My eyes are wide open and I'm very aware of the hardships of life. I don't want to make it a part of my entertainment.

 

I truly wish authors and readers of romance fiction would take the satisfaction of pure entertainment as "enough." :-) I know, I'm a simple girl. LOL But I see this country, and our society, as the beauty of individuals and unique personalities. Not everyone is college educated, but that doesn't make them a less-valuable member of the community. Along the way in my writing, I've met judges, lawyers, doctors - and they were wonderful, kind, friendly and happy.

I've also met stay-at-home moms, domestic maids, mechanics, janitors... and they were NO LESS wonderful, kind and friendly and happy.

A lack of formal education doesn't make a person dumb, anymore than a formal education makes a person smart. It only makes them educated. ;-)

 

Over analyzation of anything makes my head ache. So for me, I love writing romantic, sexy stories. I love meeting my readers - whatever background or present status they have. All in all, I'm just lovin' life in a big way. ;-)

 

Viva la Romance!

 

HUGS!

 

Lori

by leeann_burke on 04-27-2009 08:21 AM

Hi Michelle,

 

Personally I don't care what the authors background is. All I was a reader is a good book. What makes a good book for me is when a writer can make me forget about my life and my current troubles by captivating my attention for a few hours. I love to loose myself in a good book.

 

Leeann Burke

by Moderator dhaupt on 04-27-2009 09:38 AM

Wow Michelle, welcome to the dark side and what a great community it is here.

I constantly flaunt my love of romance writing and writers by displaying my novels paperback as well as HC wherever I am I despise the word trashy novel and sing praises of the romance genre everywhere I go. I am a voracious reader of all great fiction and there is no better storyteller than a romance writer because they don't see things in black and white.

So here here to all of my compatriots who bash book snobs!!

And thank you for the wonderful article!! 

by Author TeresaMedeiros on 04-27-2009 09:51 AM

Welcome to B&N, Michelle!  Great blog!  I've come to the conclusion that academic credentials in general have absolutely nothing to do with great writing. You can have them and be an amazing writer or you could have a GED and be an amazing writer. I don't think you can even make the distinction that someone with academic credentials can be an excellent writer while someone without them can be an excellent storyteller.  Because the exact opposite might be true. Being able to turn a beautiful phrase that evokes emotion in the reader has more to do with natural talent and the ability to learn through osmosis by reading than with academic credentials. 

 

I think aspiring writers can really struggle with this because they want to believe you can major in literature or creative writing in college and then go on to a successful writing career when that very rarely happens.

by EMSelinger on 04-27-2009 04:20 PM

Hi, Michelle!  Congratulations on the new venue; these are some mighty classy digs you've got here, and you're off to a terrific start. 


To pick up on something that Teresa M mentioned a comment ago, I'd have to agree that (alas!) majoring in English doesn't guarantee that you'll learn how to turn a phrase.  I learned more about writing in my years writing journalism--book reviews, mostly--than in granduate school, and more than that as a little boy showing my father rough drafts of my schoolwork.  (I think the first paper I turned in without his feedback came my junior year of high school.)  Whenever he found a well-crafted sentence or paragraph, he'd read it aloud to us kids, and we'd talk about what made it sing.  

 

Anyway, I really look forward to keeping up with your posts here, and I suspect that the rest of us at the conference will do the same! 

by MarthaE on 04-27-2009 10:08 PM
Hi Michelle - Finally figured out I had to sign in on the club room as well as the overall site!  I happen to be an attorney. Reading romance as well as other books is a relaxation for me.  I have started writing reviews and posting them for authors I have met online and books I have won in contests.  I believe in great variety!  I enjoy some of the classics but I also enjoy good storytelling.  I have been pleasantly surprised at the wonderful descriptions and characters painted by some of the new authors I have been reading.  Thanks for being an encouragement to authors who want to share love and fun with authors who are looking for some escape.
by Blogger Michelle_Buonfiglio on 04-27-2009 10:24 PM

Hi, Lori! Thanks for stopping by.  I know you have a very 'down home' view of the writer-reader relationship, just as I know -- especially from attending your Lori Foster/Diane Castell Readers & Authors Get Together -- that you encourage a kind of 'egalitarianism' among all levels of the industry.    You write: I truly wish authors and readers of romance fiction would take the satisfaction of pure entertainment as "enough."   I wonder what would be the key to making us feel that way. It's a hard row to hoe for many of us, and may say more about our struggles to simply think we're 'ok,' rather than the reaction of any outside world.

 

Leann, well and succinctly said!  

 

Thanks so much for the warm welcome, to both b&n.com and the Dark Side.  It's cool how you recognize the unique nature of romance storytelling, and how adept romance authors have to be to succeed, not just in the business, but more importantly in convincing their readers that they've figured out that one 'new way' to get to HEA that nobody's written before. As you know, the romance construct always may be the same, but the story never is.  Hey! Let's work to get everyone to feel Unabashedly Romantic, and to flaunt their romance reads everywhere they go! 

 

Hullo, Teresa! Thank you for the welcome and your thoughts!  You wrote (and I really like this): Being able to turn a beautiful phrase that evokes emotion in the reader has more to do with natural talent and the ability to learn through osmosis by reading.  I once read an article about how Harlequin encourages their readers to become authors.  While the article's author was fairly condescending, poor kid, I think she probably scored some new authors for Hquin.  Your point is so important: If one isn't a romance reader, one will have a tough time figuring out how to 'sing to the audience,' no matter how remarkable the pipes.  

by Blogger Michelle_Buonfiglio on 04-28-2009 11:12 AM

Welcome, Lori!  I like how you've written: I truly wish authors and readers of romance fiction would take the satisfaction of pure entertainment as "enough." :-) I guess some of us aren't able to do that because we;re still working on getting comfortable with who we are in general.  We can tell ourselves a lot of stories about what people think about romance writers and readers when they're not saying anything.  And when they do say stuff, we might want to offer them some empathy, think, 'wow, i wonder what's going on in their lives that won't let them get in touch w/emotions and sensuality and stuff. Clearly it's coming to a head as rudeness.  must be tough."  I also like your egalitarian approach to readers/writers/industry folks. It's nowhere more clear than at your annual Reader and Author Get Together.  What a good karma  and good business fest.

 

Well and succinctly said, Leeann! Why can't I write more like you?

 

Thanks for the warm welcome, dhaupt!  You've hit on one of the best things about romance,the flexibility of the writers. How clever one must be to use the romance construct every time, yet work out the road to HEA in a new way.  Or the road to OE (Optimistic Ending, the phrase being used a lot now, which I'll have more to say abvout later today). :smileyhappy:

 

Teresa bella!   You write: Being able to turn a beautiful phrase that evokes emotion in the reader has more to do with natural talent and the ability to learn through osmosis by reading.  Perfect!  I once read an article about how Harlequin woos and nurtures Hquin readers to become Hquin authors.  The author was kinda condescending, poor kid, but I'm convinced a bunch of folks reading that article visited eharlequin to check into writing a book for them -- a dream of many.  Writing a book's gotta be like singing opera.  You can have the pipes, but if you've never heard a glorious voice perform, something like my fave, Magda's aria from "La Rondine," you don't know what you're reaching for, or how to move an audience.  'least that's how I see it.

by Blogger Michelle_Buonfiglio on 04-28-2009 11:21 AM

ugh. thought I lost that last comment and rewrote. appologies.

 

Thanks so much for stopping in, Eric, and sharing that wonderful story of your father and his making writing a 'family affair.'  He really made it akin to the family dinner, didn't he?  Very nourishing, in a way, although I'm sure you have stories of wishing he'd encouraged you to keep some dramatic phrase you absolutely had fallen in love with. :smileyhappy:   I'm just really moved by that.  And, funnily enough, I've learned a ton by writing for journalistic organizations, especially writing tight, though you wouldn't know it from my comments. There's a great post on this blog about a journalist's experience w/ twitter an 'writing tight.'  I'll look forward to yours and your scholar posse's input and tutelage here, as well.

MarthaE!  Thanks! I'd just written someone last night so I could help you!  I'll make sure everyone knows what you've found.  You've given me high praise; grazie. And I'm very happy to learn more about you and how your love of 'relaxation fiction' has turned you toward getting the word out about good romance. Seems you take a similar view, that there's good to be found throughout the spectrum of storytelling and writing ability and -- when it's at it's best, a combo of both.  Glad you're here.

by Moderator becke_davis on 04-29-2009 01:06 PM
Michelle - It sounds like a great conference.  I'm reading everything these days -- I love Ann Christopher and I like a lot of the Kimani Press authors.  I've even read some of the genre stretching books that are fairly shocking.  At my age, I'm relatively unshockable.  I just love to read.
by Blogger Michelle_Buonfiglio on 05-03-2009 01:22 PM
Becke! Ann is a fave of mine, too, and I'm hoping to write lots about Kimani press in this column, and African American/Black romance and the authors who create it.  The conference was wild and soon I'll be having a special week at Romance: B(u)y the Book with some of the scholars who presented about race and romance.
by international2 on 09-13-2011 04:53 PM

A Good Novel to Read in the Witching hours between Nightfall to Daybreak!

 

Every once in a decade there is a rare historical romance novel of dreamer’s a recurring dream hits the market. Broken Vows Part I is a historical romance novel filled with betrayal, deceit, and resilient love.

 

Your name was selected to receive this invitation: To one who appreciates reading good romance novels. Have The Time Of Your Life Reading This New Historical Romance Novel!

 

Part I presents a story of friendship between three sisters,

the decisions they make that tore them apart through

bitterness, conflict, family secrets, romance and treachery.

Abigail reveals her shocking life story to her friends.

 

Broken Vows is now on sale at Amazon.com by clicking the link below.

 

Be Prepared to Learn the Truth!

Sylvia Lynn Mines

                        Broken Vows Part I & II released in September 18, 2011 Amazon.com

Broken Vows I

Authored by Sylvia Lynn Mines

 

5.5" x 8.5" (13.97 x 21.59 cm)
Full Color on White paper
350 pages

ISBN-13: 978-1463755904 (CreateSpace-Assigned)
ISBN-10: 1463755902
BISAC: Fiction / Romance / Adult

Broken Vows is a historical romance novel that is filled with betrayal, deceit, resilient love and other steamy characteristics that changed a woman's life dramatically. Book clubs the world over will love this book. Broken Vows is a story of friendship between sisters and the decisions they make that tore them apart through family secrets...conflicts...bitterness...and treachery. Abigail believes an evil curse was placed on the women of her family and she embarks on a journey to break the curse, but disaster strikes and only the man she loves can rescue her.

About Unabashedly Bookish: The BN Community Blog
Unabashedly Bookish features new articles every day from the Book Clubs staff, guest authors, and friends on hot topics in the world of books, language, writing, and publishing. From trends in the publishing business to updates on genre fiction fan communities, from fun lessons on grammar to reflections on literature in our personal lives, this blog is the best source for your daily dose of all things bookish.

Advertisement