ES: Joe, your latest book, Listed, is about the Endangered Species Act
and how it has played out, in some surprising and unexpected ways, for both us humans and animal species and trees in the years since it became law.

 

While reading Listed, I really enjoyed the names of some of the species. Have you ever been involved in naming a new species, and if so, how was that? If not, what are some of your favorite names—any that you find particularly evocative, funny, appealing, or just plain odd? 

 

 

JR: I am currently working on describing a new species of snapping turtle from the Suwannee River in Florida and Georgia. We are struggling with the name. The genus is Macrochelys (roughly, “big turtle”; the alligator snapper is one of the largest freshwater turtles in the world.) Its current species epithet is temminckii, named after a nineteenth-century Dutch zoologist. There are some wonderful herpetologists in the area who would deserve recognition, but in the end, I think I favor the turtle’s source: suwannensis. Macrochelys suwanneei. It has a nice sound, though I admit that I haven’t checked whether the gender of the epithet matches the genus yet.

 

ES: As both a wordsmith and a scientist, how do you relate to the terms for groups of animals, such as a den of lions, a murder of crows, a gaggle of geese? Do you enjoy them or use them? Is there a general feeling about such words among conservation biologists?

 

JR: Well, we don’t use them in polite society much—except for maybe a culture of bacteria. But I do love a good collective noun. How could you top a murder of crows?

 

I’ll add two to the list, which I think are neologisms. One is a constellation of spiders. And what do you call a group of biologists? A cell, of course. I have to thank the poet William Logan for that one.

 

ES: On the topic of nomenclature, as editors and readers know, there's often more than one way to spell the popular name of species. What standard reference do scientists use for species names? Is one commonly accepted for popular names? 

 

JR: Different journals have different rules, but I doubt many of them worry too much about common names. I suspect that most American journals rely on Merriam-Webster (at least I, as an author, do). In my publications, I am comfortable with using several different common names for variety (European green crab, green crab, shore crab). This is acceptable, in part, because they are all pegged to a Latin binomial: Carcinus maenas, in this case.

 

The standard reference for animals is the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. Its code is intended to ensure that any given animal taxon is known under one universally recognized scientific name. The call for just such a code dates back to the 1840s: Darwin was on the first committee, and Hugh Strickland drew up the first rules.

 

 

ES: Many of us remember the phrase “binomial nomenclature” from high school biology. How is Linnaeus’s system faring these days? 

 

JR: If we had to do it again, I suspect that many biologists would use a system quite different from the one put together by Linnaeus in the eighteenth century. His ideas were both radical and practical, organizing species into hierarchical groups from the species level all the way up to kingdoms. But for modern scientists, the idea of species is far more fluid. Species interbreed, they split, rejoin, and go extinct. Linnaeus and his contemporaries thought they were stable. Even the idea of kingdoms is under question, as microbes make up the vast majority of life on earth. (Linnaeus didn’t have the tools to see them.) Animals and plants are just a small branch on the evolutionary tree of life.

 

The evolutionary biologist John Avise suggests that at the very least we should put a time stamp on the Linnaean system. The genus Drosophila dates back more than 30 million years; our own genus, Homo, is very young, dating back only about 3 million years. We split hairs among our close relatives and tend to clump insects and plants. It’s probably too late to pack us into a new genus, with the rest of the great apes, but at least a time clip makes clear some of the biases inherent in the way we see the world and our own evolutionary history. 

 

Joe Roman is a conservation biologist and researcher at the University of Vermont. His writing has appeared in the New York TimesSan Francisco Chronicle, Audubon, Bon Appetit, and Harvard magazine. He is the author of Whale.

 

Want to keep up with my reviews, and all of Barnes & Noble’s exclusive reviews, authors interviews, videos, promotions, and more? Please follow us on Twitter: @BNBuzz!

Ellen Scordato has 25 years' book publishing experience as an editor, copy editor, proofreader, and managing editor. She's now a partner in The Stonesong Press, a nonfiction book producer and agency. In addition to her work at Stonesong, Ellen has taught grammar, punctuation, and style at the New School for more than 12 years in the English Language Studies department and taught English as a Second Language at Cabrini Immigrant Services.



0 Kudos
Comments
by twi-ny on ‎06-30-2011 02:24 PM

LISTED is really a terrific book. Roman adds wonderful touches of humor and personal insight into what could have been — or maybe even should have been — a very dry topic. But he meets fascinating, wacky characters, devoted nature enthusiasts and scientists, and lots of great creatures most of us have never heard of, traveling to places we'd now like to go to. LISTED is a very funny, very important, and very necessary book. Scrabble players will love it too, since there are so many cool and unusual words throughout the enticing narrative.

by Blogger Ellen_Scordato on ‎06-30-2011 05:47 PM

Thanks, yes! I didn't even think about the Scrabble possibilities. . . .which are excellent.

by on ‎07-05-2011 01:09 PM
 
What do you call a bunch of biologists?

 

Ah, Ellen, is this a knock-knock joke?... I don't know the answer.  What do you call a bunch of biologists? 

 

Sorry, when I finished reading this article, I felt like I had to go back to school and see what I missed in the "terminology" department.  I didn't take biology, and "binomial nomenclature" means nothing to me.

 

I love watching NOVA, and Nature programs, where conservation is practiced.  Recently, I watched a program that took me to Australia, where plants were gleaned to extract microbiological organisms for research in new modern medicines, to fight against constant new strains of bacteria and viruses, and deceases we still don't have cures for -  Interesting, touching, and exciting story.  The question remained:  What happens when we indiscriminately cut down our forests of plants? Thought for the day.

K.

About Unabashedly Bookish: The BN Community Blog
Unabashedly Bookish features new articles every day from the Book Clubs staff, guest authors, and friends on hot topics in the world of books, language, writing, and publishing. From trends in the publishing business to updates on genre fiction fan communities, from fun lessons on grammar to reflections on literature in our personal lives, this blog is the best source for your daily dose of all things bookish.

Advertisement

Since 1997, you’ve been coming to BarnesandNoble.com to discuss everything from Stephen King to writing to Harry Potter. You’ve made our site more than a place to discover your next book: you’ve made it a community. But like all things internet, BN.com is growing and changing. We've said goodbye to our community message boards—but that doesn’t mean we won’t still be a place for adventurous readers to connect and discover.

Now, you can explore the most exciting new titles (and remember the classics) at the Barnes & Noble Book Blog. Check out conversations with authors like Jeff VanderMeer and Gary Shteyngart at the B&N Review, and browse write-ups of the best in literary fiction. Come to our Facebook page to weigh in on what it means to be a book nerd. Browse digital deals on the NOOK blog, tweet about books with us,or self-publish your latest novella with NOOK Press. And for those of you looking for support for your NOOK, the NOOK Support Forums will still be here.

We will continue to provide you with books that make you turn pages well past midnight, discover new worlds, and reunite with old friends. And we hope that you’ll continue to tell us how you’re doing, what you’re reading, and what books mean to you.

Categories